2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-014-9764-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of Critical Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma via Network Analysis of Gene Expression Profile

Abstract: Biomarker discovery is of great importance in diagnosis and treatment of diseases. In present study, a number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified for lung adenocarcinoma via comparative analysis of gene expression data. A gene expression core signature was generated for four types of lung adenocarcinoma (EGFR-mutated, KRAS-mutated, ALK-mutated and triple-negative adenocarcinoma). Functional enrichment analysis with DAVID tools revealed that up-regulated genes were mainly associated with ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pathologic stages of LAC are critical factors for cancer treatment and outcome prediction. A better understanding of LAC staging will pave the way for novel therapies for LAC [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathologic stages of LAC are critical factors for cancer treatment and outcome prediction. A better understanding of LAC staging will pave the way for novel therapies for LAC [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,25 Network analysis of gene expression by Huang et al shows that ICT1 is a potential biomarker for LC. 10 However, the role of ICT1 in NSCLC cells remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 ICT1 has been identified as a hug gene for LC and guessed to play an important role in the progression of LC. 10 However, its role in LC has not been further investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al . showed several hub genes, four of which were suggested as potential biomarkers . In this study, we selected the top 20 DE genes detected by each meta‐analysis method, and the DE genes identified by SR method outperformed the others for classification capability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%