The description of electron pairs is at the heart of understanding the chemistry of a given compound because reorganization of electron pairs drives any chemical reaction. A widely used method to describe the electron distribution within a compound is the topological analysis of the electron density (ED).[1] The ED gives information on concentration and depletion of electrons, but not on the pairing of electrons. In contrast, the recently introduced electron localizability indicator (ELI [2] ) is a measure of electron pair localization. Up to now, a great advantage of the ED over the ELI was that only the ED could be derived from a crystallographic X-ray diffraction experiment. Herein, we describe how we made the ELI deducible from the experiment by using the X-ray constrained wavefunction (XCW) fitting procedure. [3] In this method, a wavefunction for an isolated molecule or one embedded in the crystal is constrained to reproduce the X-ray diffraction data while minimizing the electronic energy. We implemented the formula of the ELI (ELI-D(t), [4] ) into the program Tonto [5] and thus made it accessible to the experimentally derived wavefunction resulting from the XCW fitting procedure. [6] Epoxide derivatives serve as test cases for a first application of the new experimentally derived ELI. The high strain in the three-membered C-O-C ring causes broad synthetic [7] and pharmaceutical [8] applications of epoxides. Molecular orbital models describe the two main aspects of the ring strain: The Fçrster-Coulson-Moffitt model [9] shows that CÀ O and CÀC bonds are bent outwards, whereas the Walsh model [10] shows delocalization through the interior of the ring. Both imply that the epoxide ring is unsaturated and can interact with p systems. For cyclopropane, experimental ED studies confirm that bonds bend outwards; [11] but for epoxides, there are only few experimental ED studies with inconclusive results. [12] In this work, a series of epoxide derivatives is studied. From unsubstituted epoxide (1) to tetracyanoepoxide (4), the number and strength of electron-withdrawing substituents increase continuously. Compounds 3 and 4 serve as model compounds for pharmaceutically important protease inhibitors. [13] Single crystals were obtained and measured at low temperatures (25 and 100 K) and up to very high resolutions (d < 0.5 ) mainly using a synchrotron source.[14] The final geometries and the experimentally derived ED distributions were determined by multipole modeling.[15] Subsequent XCW fitting yielded experimentally derived wavefunctions (HF/cc-pVDZ), from which the ELI was calculated and topologically analyzed (model exp). For comparison, isolated-molecule calculations were performed at the experimental (model sp) and at the optimized (model opt) geometries at the same level of theory. For experimental and computational details, see the Supporting Information.The representations of the topology of the epoxide ring in Figure 1 are generally the same for all four compounds and for the three models, exp, sp, and opt, ...