2006
DOI: 10.2466/pms.103.2.515-525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of Intellectual Maturity: Exploring South African Preschoolers' Scores on the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test and Teachers' Assessment

Abstract: The present study explored the relationship between South African preschool children's intelligence scores achieved on the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test (GHD), and the accuracy of teachers' ratings of the human-figure drawings and teachers' general perceptions of children's intellectual maturity. The GHD was administered individually to 30 boys and 30 girls between the ages of 4 and 6 years (M = 4.5. SD = 0.7) from a multicultural (Black, Colored, and White) preschool near the Cape, South Africa. The three cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few cognitive screening tools for young children in Sub-Saharan Africa and this test was considered the most appropriate. This revised version of DAP has been previously used in African countries (Lotz, Loxton, Naidoo, 2005; Loxton, Mostert, Moffatt, 2006; Powell, Walker, Rogathe, et al 2015). An age scaled score was recorded for each drawing, and mean scores were calculated (range 40-130).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few cognitive screening tools for young children in Sub-Saharan Africa and this test was considered the most appropriate. This revised version of DAP has been previously used in African countries (Lotz, Loxton, Naidoo, 2005; Loxton, Mostert, Moffatt, 2006; Powell, Walker, Rogathe, et al 2015). An age scaled score was recorded for each drawing, and mean scores were calculated (range 40-130).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen measures were selected to explore child outcomes, these measures focused on variables representative of or linked to developmental outcomes inclusive of mental health and wellbeing, cognition and educational attainment, positive and negative community interactions, exposure to violence and discipline experience. All measures were selected with a focus on age appropriateness, previous use in sub-Saharan Africa, validation and ease of administration (Loxton et al, 2006 ; Madge et al, 1985 ; Skinner et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%