2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of Metagenomic and Genomic Libraries Reveals Three Classes of Bacterial Enzymes That Overcome the Toxicity of Acrylate

Abstract: Acrylate is produced in significant quantities through the microbial cleavage of the highly abundant marine osmoprotectant dimethylsulfoniopropionate, an important process in the marine sulfur cycle. Acrylate can inhibit bacterial growth, likely through its conversion to the highly toxic molecule acrylyl-CoA. Previous work identified an acrylyl-CoA reductase, encoded by the gene acuI, as being important for conferring on bacteria the ability to grow in the presence of acrylate. However, some bacteria lack acuI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acrylate, which can represent 10–15% of the total carbon in coral exudates (Tapiolas et al ., ), is also an important carbon source in marine environment. Many marine bacteria that cleave DMSP subsequently metabolise the product acrylate as a carbon source for growth (Yoch, ; Todd et al ., ; Curson et al ., , Curson et al ., ). However, acrylate is toxic and is further converted into other intracellular toxic compounds, such as the electrophile acryloyl‐CoA that attacks sulfhydryl groups, which are detrimental to bacteria (Clayden et al ., ; Todd et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Acrylate, which can represent 10–15% of the total carbon in coral exudates (Tapiolas et al ., ), is also an important carbon source in marine environment. Many marine bacteria that cleave DMSP subsequently metabolise the product acrylate as a carbon source for growth (Yoch, ; Todd et al ., ; Curson et al ., , Curson et al ., ). However, acrylate is toxic and is further converted into other intracellular toxic compounds, such as the electrophile acryloyl‐CoA that attacks sulfhydryl groups, which are detrimental to bacteria (Clayden et al ., ; Todd et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, SAR11 α‐proteobacteria (order Pelagibacterales), which are the most abundant heterotrophic bacteria in the oceans, were shown to both cleave and demethylate DMSP (Sun et al ., ). There are many studies of microbial DMSP cleavage and demethylation, but only two detailed reports of acrylate utilization in DMSP‐catabolizing bacteria, those being Halomonas HTNK1 (an oceanospirillales) and Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS‐3 (a Roseobacter) (Todd et al ., ; Reisch et al ., ; Curson et al ., ). Two different pathways for acrylate utilization and detoxification were proposed, the AcuN‐AcuK pathway and the PrpE‐AcuI pathway, which use the acryloyl‐CoA transferase (AcuN) and acryloyl‐CoA hydratase (AcuK) or the propionate‐CoA ligase (PrpE) and acryloyl‐CoA reductase (AcuI) enzymes, respectively, as the key enzymes (Todd et al ., ; Reisch et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, genome context can provide important hints regarding the enzymatic function of ddd+ genes. Acrylate, the verified product of all cupin Ddd+ enzymes ( Table 1), is toxic, 33,34 and previous studies indicated proximal genes that relate to acrylate catabolism. These include: acuI, a zinc/iron dependent alcohol reductase that converts acrylyl-CoA into propanoyl-CoA; 17,33 acuK (a dehydratase) and acuN (a CoA transferase) that can jointly convert acrylate into 3-hydroxypropionate; 35 or cytochrome dependence oxi-reductases that could also catabolize acrylate.…”
Section: Genome Context Suggests That Dddq and Dddw's Primary Activitmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…HIB‐CoA hydrolases are required for l ‐valine catabolism and appear to prevent the accumulation of toxic metabolic intermediates, particularly methacrylyl‐CoA. Evidence presented here and elsewhere (Curson et al ., , PLoS ONE 9:e97660) demonstrated that Smb20752 and NGR_b20860 can also prevent metabolic toxicity, are required for l ‐valine metabolism, and play an undefined role in 3‐hydroxybutyrate catabolism. We present evidence that the symbiotic defect of the HIB‐CoA hydrolase mutants is independent of the inability to catabolize l ‐valine and suggest it relates to the toxicity resulting from metabolism of other compounds possibly related to 3‐hydroxybutyric acid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%