2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-012-0798-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of pea germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten days after inoculation, disease severity was rated based on a scale of 0–4 as described above. Plants with scores of 0–2 and 3–4 were classified as resistant and susceptible, respectively [25,26,27,31,58]. Those plants identified as E. pisi -resistant were tested again to confirm their resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ten days after inoculation, disease severity was rated based on a scale of 0–4 as described above. Plants with scores of 0–2 and 3–4 were classified as resistant and susceptible, respectively [25,26,27,31,58]. Those plants identified as E. pisi -resistant were tested again to confirm their resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F 2:3 families with scores of 0–2 and 3–4 were classified as homozygous resistant and homozygous susceptible, respectively. Families with scores of 0–2 and 3–4 were considered segregated to E. pisi resistance [27,31,58]. The families identified as homozygous resistant or resistance segregated were subjected to repeated testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Till date, various research work has been carried out for the management of powdery mildew in pea plant [9] [10] [11]. Knowing the importance of this vegetable crop by exploring the literature we therefore, continued this research by deciphering the diversity at er loci in pathogen resistant pea lines [12] which was screened under invitro conditions [13]. Pathogen causing powdery mildew was collected from Northwest Himalayas in which the maximum number of isolates were collected from Lahul area of trans-Himalayas [14] [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longwan 1. Ten days after inoculation, disease severity was scored using a scale of 0–4, according to the infected foliage area, macroscopic and microscopic observation of mycelia growth and sporulation [ 29 , 39 , 40 , 43 ] ( S1 Fig ). 0 = No colony or mycelium growth on inoculated leave; 1 = few colony with a film of mycelium growth and mycelium with very little sporulation; 2 = a few countable colonies with evident mycelium growth and mycelium with slight sporulation; 3 = uncountable colonies with abundant growth mycelium and mycelium with moderate to heavy sporulation; 4 = infected leaves fully covered by abundant growth mycelium with heavy to very heavy sporulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease severity was determined using a scale of 0–4 as stated above ( S1 Fig ), 10 days after inoculation. Plants with scores of 0–2 and 3–4 were classified as resistant and susceptible, respectively [ 29 , 43 ]. The plants considered resistant to E .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%