Screening of psychiatric outpatients for borderline personality disorder with the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

Melartin, Tarja; Hakkinen, Miikka; Koivisto, Maaria; Suominen, Kirsi; Isometsä, Erkki

doi:10.1080/08039480903062968

Cited by 18 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We found that a cutoff score of 5 increased the diagnostic efficiency of the MSI-BPD, with particularly improved sensitivity. It should be noted that the threshold established in the current study is lower than the scores established in the initial validation study [5] (≥7; Zanarini and colleagues) and in several subsequent studies [13,15,17,19].…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 54%

“…A maximization approach to select an optimal cut-off (the best balance between sensitivity and specificity) was widely used and the authors recommended cut-offs ranging from 5 [12] to 8 [13]. It should be noted that 5 authors recommended a threshold of 7 [5,15,[17][18][19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Results 84 patients diagnosed as having a BPD according to the SIDP-IV participated in the study. The mean age of patients was 17 [16][17], 86 % (n = 73) were female, and 91 % were high school students. 87 controls participated in the assessments, with 3 controls being excluded because of prior psychological or psychiatric consultations.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…87 controls participated in the assessments, with 3 controls being excluded because of prior psychological or psychiatric consultations. The mean age of the control group was 16 [15][16][17], 76 % (n = 64) were female, and all were of high school level. There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning age, gender and level of education, respectively p = 0.08, p = 0.073 and p = 0.35.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Validation of the French version of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

Pham‐Scottez¹,

Mirkovic²,

Cailhol³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 54%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validation of the French version of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

Pham‐Scottez¹,

Mirkovic²,

Cailhol³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The MSI is a ten-item questionnaire designed according to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria to screen for BPD (Zanarini et al, 2003). It has been translated into Finnish and validated in Finland (Melartin et al, 2009). Each item requires a "yes/no" response.…”

Section: Mclean Screening Instrument (Msi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationships between self-reported childhood traumatic experiences, attachment style, neuroticism and features of borderline personality disorders in patients with mood disorders

Baryshnikov

Joffe

Koivisto

et al. 2017

Journal of Affective Disorders

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We found moderately strong correlations between self-reported BPD features and concurrent high neuroticism, reported childhood traumatic experiences and Attachment Anxiety also among patients with mood disorders. Independent predictors for BPD features include young age, frequency of childhood traumatic experiences and high neuroticism. Insecure attachment may partially mediate the relationship between childhood traumatic experiences and borderline features among mood disorder patients.

show abstract

Catastrophizing, negative affectivity, and borderline personality disorder

Mason

Mullins‐Sweatt

2021

Personality & Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The core features of borderline personality disorder (BPD) include problematic interpersonal relationships, behavioral and affective dysregulation, identity problems, and cognitive dysregulation. Cognitive dysregulation, such as catastrophizing, rumination, and thought suppression, contributes to emotion dysregulation in BPD. Previous research suggested that thought suppression fully mediated the relationship between negative affect intensity/reactivity and BPD symptoms. We predicted that catastrophizing similarly will serve as a mediator between negative affect intensity/reactivity and BPD symptoms. Two samples completed the study. First, students (N = 191) self-selected to participate in an online study through the university psychology research recruitment system. Additionally, a second sample using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk; N = 172) was utilized. Catastrophizing partially mediated the relationship between negative affect intensity/reactivity and BPD symptoms.Across these samples, results suggest that catastrophizing may have a significant role in understanding BPD symptoms, which is similar with rumination.Limitations and future directions are also discussed.

show abstract

Screening of psychiatric outpatients for borderline personality disorder with the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

Cited by 18 publications

References 0 publications

Validation of the French version of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

Validation of the French version of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

Relationships between self-reported childhood traumatic experiences, attachment style, neuroticism and features of borderline personality disorders in patients with mood disorders

Catastrophizing, negative affectivity, and borderline personality disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About