2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of solid acid catalysts for etherification of glycerol with isobutene under identical conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 Figure 6c shows that the pH of the aqueous solution changed based on the contents of the HPPEP colloids in the solution; this pH change was easily indicated by the color change of the methyl red indicator. Based on acid−base titration, the acid proton density of the HPPEP colloids was estimated to be ∼0.26 mmol H + /g (Figure S23), higher and lower than those obtained using a zeolite-based solid acid catalyst (Zeolite Y (SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 = 80): 0.13 mmol H + /g) 64 and a PS sulfonate-based solid acid catalyst (Amberlyst 15: 4.50 mmol H + /g; one of the strongest solid acid catalysts), 64 respectively. In terms of selectivity, which is one of the main issues in solid acid catalyst chemistry, the obtained moderateacid proton density is advantageous because it imparts a degree of selectivity that enables the reaction of specific molecules with a strong reactivity in the presence of other molecules with a weak reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 Figure 6c shows that the pH of the aqueous solution changed based on the contents of the HPPEP colloids in the solution; this pH change was easily indicated by the color change of the methyl red indicator. Based on acid−base titration, the acid proton density of the HPPEP colloids was estimated to be ∼0.26 mmol H + /g (Figure S23), higher and lower than those obtained using a zeolite-based solid acid catalyst (Zeolite Y (SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 = 80): 0.13 mmol H + /g) 64 and a PS sulfonate-based solid acid catalyst (Amberlyst 15: 4.50 mmol H + /g; one of the strongest solid acid catalysts), 64 respectively. In terms of selectivity, which is one of the main issues in solid acid catalyst chemistry, the obtained moderateacid proton density is advantageous because it imparts a degree of selectivity that enables the reaction of specific molecules with a strong reactivity in the presence of other molecules with a weak reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent detailed study, Bozkurt et al [108] compared the performance of more than 70 solid acid catalysts. Unmodified and modified ion exchange resins, zeolites, silica, and heteropolyacids were tested under similar conditions.…”
Section: Glycerol-isobutene Etherificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the catalysts required, homogeneous acids, i.e., those that are soluble in glycerol, such as p-toluensulfonic acid or the heteropoly acid H 3 PW 12 O 40 , are much more active than the heterogeneous ones and allow obtaining significantly higher yields of di-and tri-tBGEs [16]. The interest in avoiding the use of the homogeneous acids due to corrosion, safety, and environmental issues has fostered the search for solid acid catalysts among which cation exchange resins with highly crosslinked structure, large pore zeolites, sulfonated mesostructured silicas and carbons, and supported tungstophosphoric acid have provided the best results with both IB [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and TBA [19,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. These materials require a fine-tuning of their acid and textural properties in order to develop suitable catalytic activity and selectivity toward higher tBGEs; at the same time, they are also very sensitive to water, which solvates the hydrophilic active sites, rendering them poorly active.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%