“…The formation of CO from the electroreduction of CO 2 is more favorable, either electrochemically, thermodynamically, and in certain circumstances also kinetically than other two-electron reduction products. , Single electron (e̅) reduction of CO 2 to CO 2 •– is an energetically demanding approach (−2.17 V vs Ag/AgCl), while multiple-e̅ reduction routes are accessible at substantially lower overpotentials. ,− Therefore, the design of new electrocatalysts to facilitate the multiple-e̅ reduction of CO 2 to CO at lower overpotential could be helpful to overcome low rates. − To date, a great number of homogeneous and heterogeneous electrocatalysts have been developed for CO 2 RR. The typical homogeneous catalysts include metal–organic frameworks, transition-metal complexes, carbon-doped and decorated materials, two-dimensional materials, MXene-based single-atom catalysts, and so on. − In recent decades, noble metal coordination complexes have enticed significant consideration in CO 2 reduction according to their potential to create efficient functional and structural models due to the availability of multiple-oxidation states based on both metal and ligands. ,,, Ruthenium as a classical noble metal catalyst was widely studied, and it also presented outstanding electrocatalytic performance. At present, great advances have also been achieved in the development of Ru-based electrocatalysts through alloying, heteroatom doping, nanocompositing, carrier-optimizing, etc.…”