2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b08237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Platform for Cell Contact Guidance Based on Inorganic Biomaterial Micro/nanotopographical Gradients

Abstract: High-throughput screening (HTS) methods based on topography gradients or arrays have been extensively used to investigate cell–material interactions. However, it is a huge technological challenge to cost efficiently prepare topographical gradients of inorganic biomaterials due to their inherent material properties. Here, we developed a novel strategy translating PDMS-based wrinkled topography gradients with amplitudes from 49 to 2561 nm and wavelengths between 464 and 7121 nm to inorganic biomaterials (SiO2, T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 2D culture conditions do not reproduce the typical environment of bone cells as they are forced to grow in monolayers (Antoni, Burckel, Josset, & Noel, ). An artificial flat and rigid surface is a geometrical, mechanical environment that affects the cytoskeleton (e.g., actin patterns) of bone cells and more broadly, their fate (Dalby, Gadegaard, & Oreffo, ; Zhou et al, ). Consequently, in contrast to 3D setups, 2D configurations notoriously skew bone cell responses to mechanical stimuli (Juignet et al, ; McCoy & O'Brien, ).…”
Section: Obstacles In Defining Optimal Flow Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, 2D culture conditions do not reproduce the typical environment of bone cells as they are forced to grow in monolayers (Antoni, Burckel, Josset, & Noel, ). An artificial flat and rigid surface is a geometrical, mechanical environment that affects the cytoskeleton (e.g., actin patterns) of bone cells and more broadly, their fate (Dalby, Gadegaard, & Oreffo, ; Zhou et al, ). Consequently, in contrast to 3D setups, 2D configurations notoriously skew bone cell responses to mechanical stimuli (Juignet et al, ; McCoy & O'Brien, ).…”
Section: Obstacles In Defining Optimal Flow Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface microtopography and micropores are surface structures on a micron scale that are often mistaken for each other. Surface roughness influences the morphology, attachment, proliferation and differentiation of bone cells in vitro (Anselme & Bigerelle, ; Sola‐Ruiz, Perez‐Martinez, Martin‐del‐Llano, Carda‐Batalla, & Labaig‐Rueda, ; Zhou et al, ). In vitro, microporosity results in a larger surface area that is believed to contribute to ion exchange as well as higher bone‐inducing protein adsorption (Gariboldi & Best, ; Hannink & Arts, ).…”
Section: Obstacles In Defining Optimal Flow Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, spontaneously wrinkled substrates became a convenient tool for controlling living cell spreading and cytoskeletal arrangement on a sub-cellular scale roughness. [14][15][16][17][18] These wavy features present rounded edges that are inspired by in vivo nano-and microtopographies, allowing to different cell type manipulations. For example, bacterial biofilm growth reduction has been obtained on dynamic wrinkles with submicron to 2 µm valleys [19] and stem cell alignment and efficient internal organization for contraction have been shown on nano-scale wrinkles for tissue engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%