2014
DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2013-0095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Stringency in the Disability Insurance Program

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Sweden, there is just a small effect of stricter health screening on disability entrants and no effect on the employment level of older workers (Karlström et al 2008). Johansson et al (2012) find reduced entry rates between 1986 and 2008 in the context of screening stringency of the disability insurance in Sweden. The stricter health access criteria for disability pension in Austria decreased the disability entrances by ten percentage points, with 45% of the affected persons remaining employed, while 46% became unemployed and 9% received sickness benefits through health insurance (Staubli 2011).…”
Section: Reform Of the Social Security Incentive Structuresmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In Sweden, there is just a small effect of stricter health screening on disability entrants and no effect on the employment level of older workers (Karlström et al 2008). Johansson et al (2012) find reduced entry rates between 1986 and 2008 in the context of screening stringency of the disability insurance in Sweden. The stricter health access criteria for disability pension in Austria decreased the disability entrances by ten percentage points, with 45% of the affected persons remaining employed, while 46% became unemployed and 9% received sickness benefits through health insurance (Staubli 2011).…”
Section: Reform Of the Social Security Incentive Structuresmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…12 For a survey of this literature and the main theoretical arguments, see for instance Starke (2006) and Van Kersbergen and Vis (2014). 13 Sweden implemented several changes to its sickness benefit scheme during the 1990s; these were, however, of limited scope (see Andr en, 2003;Johansson, Laun, & Laun, 2014). between crisis dynamics and reform activity.…”
Section: Policy Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Sweden implemented several changes to its sickness benefit scheme during the 1990s; these were, however, of limited scope (see Andrén, ; Johansson, Laun, & Laun, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the strong increase in the proportion of working-age individuals entering the DI system, many empirical papers have focused on the effectiveness of policies that reduce DI inflows and/or promote employment of those disabled individuals that keep some capacity to work (partially disabled). In this line, there is a growing literature that investigates the effect on DI (and employment) participation of particular characteristics of the DI system such as the eligibility criteria or the degree of screening stringency (Gruber and Kubik 1997;Autor and Duggan 2003;De Jong, Lindeboom and van der Klaauw 2011;Staubli 2011;Johansson, Laun and Laun 2014), the generosity of the system (Marie and Vall Castelló 2012), or particular policies providing financial or in-kind work incentives to DI beneficiaries (Moffit and Hoynes 1999;Autor and Duggan 2006;Adam, Bozio and Emmerson 2010;Benítez-Silva, Buchinsky and Rust 2010;Kostol and Mogstad 2014). The Netherlands, for example, introduced several policies during the 90's to try to reduce the inflow into the DI system as well as to promote employment of disabled workers.…”
Section: Literature On Disability and Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%