2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening the most highly cited papers in longitudinal bibliometric studies and systematic literature reviews of a research field or journal: Widespread used metrics vs a percentile citation-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When high comprehensiveness levels are targeted, Martínez-Gómez [156] believes that full representativeness may not be achieved for the field. The importance of sample selections in bibliometric studies is a highlight of the work by Pech and Delgado [157], along with the bias of period representativeness pertinent to various selections of the "most impactful papers". The same sort of situation also appears in our study when selecting unifying research tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When high comprehensiveness levels are targeted, Martínez-Gómez [156] believes that full representativeness may not be achieved for the field. The importance of sample selections in bibliometric studies is a highlight of the work by Pech and Delgado [157], along with the bias of period representativeness pertinent to various selections of the "most impactful papers". The same sort of situation also appears in our study when selecting unifying research tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same is true for the “Physics, Applied” WoSSC—which, for example, contains papers of Nuclear and Condensed , two other subfields with different research trends. That is, our classification results can provide better support for the calculation of normalized citation metrics within each subfield, an issue of growing interest in Scientometrics (Pech & Delgado, 2020, 2021); consequently, they provide more accurate and reliable academic performance evaluations of researchers and institutions—for financial, strategic or Human Resource management purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To study the most relevant publications, we considered the most relevant articles with more than 100 citations as a criterion. These publications are “highly impactful” and, as such, reference publications in the study area (Pech and Delgado, 2021). Five of the 120 articles correspond to this criterion (Table 1), with 568 citations representing 28.96% of the citations of the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%