Identifying Perinatal Depression and Anxiety 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118509722.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Tools and Methods of Identifying Perinatal Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A threshold of 13 or more will be used to identify clinically significant symptoms [ 37 ]. Although a number of cut-off points have been used in different populations [ 38 ], maximum accuracy with a probable diagnosis of depressive disorder has been shown at this cut-off point in reviews of international EPDS validation studies [ 36 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A threshold of 13 or more will be used to identify clinically significant symptoms [ 37 ]. Although a number of cut-off points have been used in different populations [ 38 ], maximum accuracy with a probable diagnosis of depressive disorder has been shown at this cut-off point in reviews of international EPDS validation studies [ 36 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key depression measures (described subsequently) are well validated and their psychometric properties are well described in general populations. The performance and psychometric properties of both generic and perinatal-specific depression measures used in the context of perinatal populations have been recently reviewed and were the subject of a full health technology report in 2009 [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%