Screening Tools as a Predictor of Injury in Gymnastics: Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Background Gymnastics requires a high level of physical ability and technical skill which utilises short sets of athleticism and artistry to perform complex and intense movements which can overload musculoskeletal tissues and result in acute injuries which can develop into chronic injuries. The aim of this systematic literature review was to investigate which screening tools predict injury in gymnasts and encompasses all genres, levels and ages. Methods An electronic search of seven databases from their inception until March 2021 was conducted. The databases were the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CINAHL, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SPORTDiscus and PEDro (the Physiotherapy Evidence Base). A combination of the following search terms was used: (1) Gymnastics AND injury AND Screening, (2) Screening AND Gymnastics and (3) Musculoskeletal AND Screening AND Gymnastics. These terms were searched in all text, abstract, title and subject terms. Studies were assessed using a 20-point scoring tool. Results The mean methodological quality score was 13.1 points (range 10–17 points). Range of motion, anthropometric and postural measurements, hypermobility, clinical diagnostic tests, movement screening tools, muscle strength, power and endurance were reported in the included studies. Some evidence existed for screening measurement of height and mass as taller and heavier gymnasts might be more susceptible to injury; however, the different methodologies utilised and lack of acknowledgment of confounding variables limit the clinical relevance of these findings. Conclusions Height and mass should be recorded during the screening process. A lack of heterogeneity in study methodology prevented a meta-analysis. Studies were limited by a lack of prospective injury design, poor injury definition, self-reporting of injury and only 2 studies reported reliability of screening tools. Further research is required to determine the role of injury screening in gymnastics. Registration: The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number CRD42020218339.

The Risk Factors Associated with Grip Lock Injuries in Artistic Gymnasts: A Systematic Review

“…It should be assumed that the problem there will soon arise and will have a mass character. The experience of gymnastics points to the need for preventive measures in this form [ 53 , 54 ].…”

Technological advances in artistic gymnastics and the impact on its development

“…Most patents aim to "optimize the gymnast's performance" (Middelkoop & Stone, 2019) and, at the same time, develop safer equipment, as we see in excerpts like these: "The object of the present invention is to improve the safety of gymnastic equipment used to support one or more raised exercise bars [...]" (US4334675A); "The Invention has for its object to improve the safety of gymnastic equipment [...]" (DE202005014583U1). The advancement of technology was also accompanied by studies that suggested a direct relationship between them and some recurrent injuries (Armstrong & Relph, 2021).…”

Effect of Exercise Training on Physical Fitness among Gymnastic Athletes: Systematic Review and Metanalysis

“…Appropriate explosive strength or power, maximal strength, sprinting, flexibility, change of direction and balance ability is pivotal and key factor for the performance of an athlete. 1,5,20 Artistic gymnastics is a sport of early specialisation as an athlete enters the high intensities of training during pre-pubertal years itself. In gymnastics relative strength is more important than absolute strength, so more focus is on body weight training to physically prepare gymnasts for powerful performance.…”