2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening tools for neuropathic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, LANSS and PDQ were employed as screening tests, and the incidence and prevalence of neuropathic pain differ in the literature. This is due to differences in definitions of neuropathic pain and pain with neuropathic characteristics, in definitions of clinical conditions/diseases associated with neuropathic pain, in the methods of case detection, and differences in case detection tools (e.g., screening tools versus electronic databases for medical cases) [ 30 , 31 ]. On the other hand, the acute and chronic periods of COVID-19 are unknown, which has grabbed the attention of the world, with different symptoms and findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, LANSS and PDQ were employed as screening tests, and the incidence and prevalence of neuropathic pain differ in the literature. This is due to differences in definitions of neuropathic pain and pain with neuropathic characteristics, in definitions of clinical conditions/diseases associated with neuropathic pain, in the methods of case detection, and differences in case detection tools (e.g., screening tools versus electronic databases for medical cases) [ 30 , 31 ]. On the other hand, the acute and chronic periods of COVID-19 are unknown, which has grabbed the attention of the world, with different symptoms and findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study by Huang et al (2012) reported a significant mean change in the spectral energy 13–50 Hz (SE 13–50Hz ) before and after acupuncture [ 8 ]. Kim et al (2017) and Shin et al (2016) had anticipated a 5% type 1 error, 80% power and 5% drop rates based on the mean change and standard deviation derived from Huang et al‘s study [ 9 , 10 ]. They had estimated a sample size of 25 based on a single arm study without a control group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsai et al (2018) concluded that the time domain analysis provides a significant variation in the hemodynamic characteristics in the different radial pulse positions and indicators [ 10 ]. Moreover, Huang et al (2011) investigated the radial pressure pulse parameters using the frequency domain analysis and reported a significant difference in SE at the Cun, Guan , and Chi pulses [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%