2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.02.23286714
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening tools used in primary health care settings to identify health behaviours in children (birth – 16 years); A systematic review of their effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability

Abstract: BackgroundChild health behaviour screening tools used in primary health care have potential as a transformative and effective strategy to support growth monitoring and the early identification of suboptimal behaviours to target strategies for intervention. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of child health behaviour screening tools used in primary health care settings.MethodsA systematic review of studies published in English in five databases (CINAHL, Medl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, they allow for easy comparison of food group intake against dietary guidelines (National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, n.d.; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, n.d.). Existing short questionnaires validated in Australian populations assess various aspects of diet, predominantly diet quality against dietary guidelines and have been developed for populations ranging from 12 months to 16 years of age (Bell et al, 2013;Dutch et al, 2023;Golley et al, 2017). For example, the 28-item Children's Dietary Questionnaire assesses the intake of 4-16-year-old children for positive indicators (i.e., vegetables, fruit, water, reduced fat products) and negative indicators (i.e., high fat/high sugar foods and beverages) of diet quality (Magarey et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, they allow for easy comparison of food group intake against dietary guidelines (National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, n.d.; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, n.d.). Existing short questionnaires validated in Australian populations assess various aspects of diet, predominantly diet quality against dietary guidelines and have been developed for populations ranging from 12 months to 16 years of age (Bell et al, 2013;Dutch et al, 2023;Golley et al, 2017). For example, the 28-item Children's Dietary Questionnaire assesses the intake of 4-16-year-old children for positive indicators (i.e., vegetables, fruit, water, reduced fat products) and negative indicators (i.e., high fat/high sugar foods and beverages) of diet quality (Magarey et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further to this, a recent review highlighted a lack of validated and reliable short diet questionnaires that measure obesity‐related dietary behaviours in young children (<5 years) (Byrne et al, 2019 ). Reviews of short dietary questionnaires highlight the lack of validated and ‘fit‐for‐purpose’ dietary assessment tools for use with infants, toddlers and pre‐school‐aged children that are feasible for use in policy and practice settings as a screening instrument to identify behaviours that place children at higher risk of poor growth, health and development (Byrne et al, 2019 ; Dutch et al, 2023 ; Golley et al, 2017 ). Therefore, this study aimed to (1) develop a short dietary questionnaire feasible for use in research and practice that assesses obesity‐related dietary behaviours of young children aged 6 months to 5 years and (2) examine the validity and reliability of the short dietary questionnaire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%