Screening with the Korean Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire for Bipolar Disorders in Adolescents: Korean Validity and Reliability Study

Objective: The present meta-analysis was conducted to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the bipolarity index (BI) and Rapid Mode Screener (RMS) as compared with the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS), the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32), and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) in people with bipolar disorder (BD). Methods: We systematically searched five databases using standard search terms, and relevant articles published between May 1990 and November 30, 2021 were collected and reviewed. Results: Ninety-three original studies were included (n=62,291). At the recommended cutoffs for the BI, HCL-32, BSDS, MDQ, and RMS, the pooled sensitivities were 0.82, 0.75, 0.71, 0.71, and 0.78, respectively, while the corresponding pooled specificities were 0.73, 0.63, 0.73, 0.77, and 0.72, respectively. However, there was evidence that the accuracy of the BI was superior to that of the other tests, with a relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOR) of 1.22 (0.98-1.52, p < 0.0001). The RMS was significantly more accurate than the other tests, with an RDOR (95%CI) of 0.79 (0.67-0.92, p < 0.0001) for the detection of BD type I (BD-I). However, there was evidence that the accuracy of the MDQ was superior to that of the other tests, with an RDOR of 1.93 (0.89-2.79, p = 0.0019), for the detection of BD type II (BD-II). Conclusion: The psychometric properties of two new instruments, the BI and RMS, in people with BD were consistent with considerably higher diagnostic accuracy than the HCL-32, BSDS, and MDQ. However, a positive screening should be confirmed by a clinical diagnostic evaluation for BD.

show abstract

“…Ultimately, 93 studies (n=62,291) were included ( , available as online-only supplementary material). 11 - 16 , 20 , 21 - 24 , 31 - 100 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the diagnostic performance of two new tools versus routine screening instruments for bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis

Sayyah

Delirrooyfard

Rahim

2022

Braz. J. Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A version of the MDQ specifically targeted adolescents was also developed but had yet to be translated into Korean at the time of this study. The Korean version of the MDQ, published in August 2018, showed a sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 0.92 when used to screen for adolescent bipolar disorder [ 26 ]. The correlation between K-CMRS and MDQ scores could have been even higher if the adolescent version had been available.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It must be noted that the MDQ and K-CMRS share some similarities but have a defining difference. The MDQ was developed strictly for screening bipolar disorder, whereas the K-CMRS was designed to assess and score manic symptoms in children and adolescents [ 26 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Korean Version of the Child Mania Rating Scale: Korean Validity and Reliability Study

Chi,

Mok,

et al. 2023

Psychiatry Investig

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Clinical rating scales are essential in psychiatry. The Young Mania Rating Scale is the gold standard for assessing mania. However, increased attention to pediatric bipolar disorder has led to the development of the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS), which is a parent-reported rating scale designed to assess mania in children and adolescents. This study aimed to translate the CMRS into Korean and assess the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the CMRS (K-CMRS).Methods The original English version of the CMRS has been translated into Korean. We enrolled 33 patients with bipolar disorder and 26 patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). All participants were evaluated using the translated K-CMRS, Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), and ADHD Rating Scale.Results The Cronbach’s α was 0.907. Correlation analyses between K-CMRS and MDQ scores yielded significant positive correlations (r=0.529, p=0.009). However, the factor analysis was unsuccessful. The total K-CMRS scores of bipolar disorder and ADHD patients were compared. However, the differences were not statistically significant.Conclusion The K-CMRS showed good internal consistency and reliability. The correlation between the K-CMRS and MDQ scores verifies its validity. The K-CMRS was designed to assess and score manic symptoms in children and adolescents but had difficulties in differentiating between bipolar disorder and ADHD. It is a valuable tool for evaluating the presence and severity of manic symptoms in pediatric patients with bipolar disorder.

show abstract

“…To improve diagnostic accuracy, additional scales including Korean version of Mood Disorder Questionnaire Adolescent version (K-MDQ-A) [21,22], Korean version of Parent-General Behavior Inventory 10-item Manic Scale (K-P-GBI-10M) [23,24] for BP, and Korean ADHD Rating Scale (K-ARS) [25,26] for ADHD were applied. K-MDQ-A is a self-report of manic symptoms for adolescent.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was completed by parents about adolescent’s symptoms. It demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity (0.72 and 0.81, respectively) at a cut-score of 5 [21,22]. K-P-GBI-10M is a 10-item parent-report instrument ranging from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating greater severity.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in Psychopathology between Offspring of Parents with Bipolar I Disorder and Those with Bipolar II Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study

Lee

Kim

Lee

et al. 2018

Psychiatry Investig

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in psychopathology between offspring of parents with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and those with bipolar II disorder (BP-II). Methods The sample included 201 offspring between 6 and 17 years of age who had at least one parent with BP-I or BP-II. The offspring were diagnostically evaluated using the Korean Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version. Psychopathology and Clinical characteristics were evaluated, including lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, depression, and childhood trauma. Lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses were also compared between schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Results In lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, offspring of parents with BP-I had significantly increased risk of developing MDD and BP-I than those with BP-II. Regarding clinical characteristics, ADHD rating scale and childhood trauma scale were significantly higher in offspring of parents with BP-I than that in those with BP-II. Conclusion The present study supports that BP-I may be etiologically distinct from BP-II by a possible genetic liability. Our findings indicate that additional research related to bipolar offspring is needed to enhance understanding of differences between BP-I and BP-II.

show abstract

Screening with the Korean Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire for Bipolar Disorders in Adolescents: Korean Validity and Reliability Study

Cited by 8 publications

References 20 publications

Assessment of the diagnostic performance of two new tools versus routine screening instruments for bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis

Assessment of the diagnostic performance of two new tools versus routine screening instruments for bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis

Development of a Korean Version of the Child Mania Rating Scale: Korean Validity and Reliability Study

Differences in Psychopathology between Offspring of Parents with Bipolar I Disorder and Those with Bipolar II Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About