2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05895-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening women at high risk for breast cancer: one program fits all?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, the UK uses a threshold of 8% for the 10-year breast cancer risk at age 40 to define high-risk. Unfortunately, due to the existing insurance contracts, the GC-HBOC can offer MRI-based surveillance to non-carriers only up to the age of 49, even though the calculated 10-year breast cancer risk will often remain well above the 5% threshold for another 10–15 years [37, 47]. On the other hand, MRI-based screening in non-carriers should probably not be extended beyond age 60–65 as due to the long lead time of MRI-based screening [42], the risk of overdiagnosis will increase in older patients [37].…”
Section: Risk Management and Risk Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, the UK uses a threshold of 8% for the 10-year breast cancer risk at age 40 to define high-risk. Unfortunately, due to the existing insurance contracts, the GC-HBOC can offer MRI-based surveillance to non-carriers only up to the age of 49, even though the calculated 10-year breast cancer risk will often remain well above the 5% threshold for another 10–15 years [37, 47]. On the other hand, MRI-based screening in non-carriers should probably not be extended beyond age 60–65 as due to the long lead time of MRI-based screening [42], the risk of overdiagnosis will increase in older patients [37].…”
Section: Risk Management and Risk Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%