Abstract:We construct linear codes from scrolls over curves of high genus and study the higher support weights di of these codes. We embed the scroll into projective space P k−1 and calculate bounds for the di by considering the maximal number of Fq-rational points that are contained in a codimension h subspace of P k−1 . We nd lower bounds of the di and for the cases of large i calculate the exact values of the di.This work follows the natural generalisation of Goppa codes to higher-dimensional varieties as studied by
“…For any linear code C and any integer h ≥ 1, let D h (C) be the set of all linear subspaces of C generated by h linearly independent elements of C. Set codimension h linear subspace of P k−1 . Johnsen and Rasmussen gave lower bounds for the integers d h (C) when T = P(E) with E a semistable vector bundle on a smooth curve [11]. A nice feature of [11] is that these lower bounds are the same for all E on a given curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Johnsen and Rasmussen gave lower bounds for the integers d h (C) when T = P(E) with E a semistable vector bundle on a smooth curve [11]. A nice feature of [11] is that these lower bounds are the same for all E on a given curve. Here we argue that for certain (very easy to construct) vector bundles these lower bounds may be improved and give the missing pieces (to me) to make further improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here we argue that for certain (very easy to construct) vector bundles these lower bounds may be improved and give the missing pieces (to me) to make further improvements. A very useful feature of [11] is that the bound in that paper are true for all semistable vector bundles. The bounds in [11] do not depend on F q , in the sense that they only depend from the geometry of the given curve over F q .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A very useful feature of [11] is that the bound in that paper are true for all semistable vector bundles. The bounds in [11] do not depend on F q , in the sense that they only depend from the geometry of the given curve over F q . As stressed in [22] it should be possible to get better bounds (in some cases) using that the gonality of a curve defined over F q may come from pencils not defined over F q .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following [11] and [7] we recall the following construction of certain evaluation codes coming from a projective bundle over a smooth curve. Fix an integer k ≥ 2.…”
“…For any linear code C and any integer h ≥ 1, let D h (C) be the set of all linear subspaces of C generated by h linearly independent elements of C. Set codimension h linear subspace of P k−1 . Johnsen and Rasmussen gave lower bounds for the integers d h (C) when T = P(E) with E a semistable vector bundle on a smooth curve [11]. A nice feature of [11] is that these lower bounds are the same for all E on a given curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Johnsen and Rasmussen gave lower bounds for the integers d h (C) when T = P(E) with E a semistable vector bundle on a smooth curve [11]. A nice feature of [11] is that these lower bounds are the same for all E on a given curve. Here we argue that for certain (very easy to construct) vector bundles these lower bounds may be improved and give the missing pieces (to me) to make further improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here we argue that for certain (very easy to construct) vector bundles these lower bounds may be improved and give the missing pieces (to me) to make further improvements. A very useful feature of [11] is that the bound in that paper are true for all semistable vector bundles. The bounds in [11] do not depend on F q , in the sense that they only depend from the geometry of the given curve over F q .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A very useful feature of [11] is that the bound in that paper are true for all semistable vector bundles. The bounds in [11] do not depend on F q , in the sense that they only depend from the geometry of the given curve over F q . As stressed in [22] it should be possible to get better bounds (in some cases) using that the gonality of a curve defined over F q may come from pencils not defined over F q .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following [11] and [7] we recall the following construction of certain evaluation codes coming from a projective bundle over a smooth curve. Fix an integer k ≥ 2.…”
Here we describe all codewords with low weight on certain Goppa codes of curves contained in a Hermitian surface H over F q 2 . We also show how to construct curves C ⊂ H with good cohomological properties (arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay curves).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.