1986
DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(86)90051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrubby Bear can make an impact on your community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After review of the full text of these studies, 21 were excluded for the following reasons: no outcomes of 7 records identified through reference list handsearching (26,38,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46) 21 failed to meet inclusion criteria (23-26, 28-30, 32-40, 42-46) Inappropriate intervention (23- 26,34,33,37,38,43) Inappropriate study design (36,39,40) Inappropriate outcome (28) Inappropriate population (44) Not relevant (29,30,32,35,42) Review (45,46) 4 eligible studies identified (10,27,31,41) INITIAL MANUSCRIPT n = 25 (10, 2 eligible studies identified (15,16) after manuscript submission interest (n = 1), inappropriate population (n = 1), inappropriate interventions (n = 9), inappropriate study design (n = 3), irrelevant subject matter (n = 5), and review (n = 2). Thus, a total of 4 trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria [10,27,31,41].…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After review of the full text of these studies, 21 were excluded for the following reasons: no outcomes of 7 records identified through reference list handsearching (26,38,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46) 21 failed to meet inclusion criteria (23-26, 28-30, 32-40, 42-46) Inappropriate intervention (23- 26,34,33,37,38,43) Inappropriate study design (36,39,40) Inappropriate outcome (28) Inappropriate population (44) Not relevant (29,30,32,35,42) Review (45,46) 4 eligible studies identified (10,27,31,41) INITIAL MANUSCRIPT n = 25 (10, 2 eligible studies identified (15,16) after manuscript submission interest (n = 1), inappropriate population (n = 1), inappropriate interventions (n = 9), inappropriate study design (n = 3), irrelevant subject matter (n = 5), and review (n = 2). Thus, a total of 4 trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria [10,27,31,41].…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%