2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-016-9772-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrutinizing URANS in Shedding Flows: The Case of Cylinder in Cross-Flow in the Subcritical Regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It may lead to the conclusion that the characteristic length and time scales do not correspond to appropriate sub-grid scales when the model is operating as sub-grid scale model, mainly due to the lack of direct tie to the grid. This is consistent with the discussion provided in [22,26] regarding uncertainties concerning the seamless hybrid methods when operating in scale-resolving mode. They cannot be considered systematic eddy-resolving methods and therefore, may produce unrealistic spectrum in some situations.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may lead to the conclusion that the characteristic length and time scales do not correspond to appropriate sub-grid scales when the model is operating as sub-grid scale model, mainly due to the lack of direct tie to the grid. This is consistent with the discussion provided in [22,26] regarding uncertainties concerning the seamless hybrid methods when operating in scale-resolving mode. They cannot be considered systematic eddy-resolving methods and therefore, may produce unrealistic spectrum in some situations.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is generally expected that the hybrid models can reliably be applied to flow configurations with sufficiently strong instability available in the base flow (flows with strong swirl/separation) [18]. However, there is no guarantee that the models always deliver accurate results since non of these models qualify for a systematic eddy resolving approach and therefore, they should be applied only to flows for which they have been extensively tested [26]. In the following, we will shortly describe each approach focusing mainly on the triggering mechanisms used in each approach to make a transition from URANS to scale-resolving mode.…”
Section: Hybrid Turbulence Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct comparison with PIV experiments showed very good agreement of the position of main time-averaged vortices. We find that the recirculating bubble manifests low-frequency oscillations similar to the unconfined case [1,3]. Further work will be devoted to studying the elongated vortical structures found also in confined turbulent jets [4][5][6][7] and their role in heat transfer across the channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The presence of walls strongly affects dynamics of the flow resulting in the change of time-averaged characteristics. Figure 3 (left) shows the comparison of the time-averaged axial velocity and streamlines for the confined (present) case in the mid-plane (z=0.5H=0.2D) and without walls from previous simulations [1]. While the pattern is the same, the recirculating bubble shrinks and becomes narrower in the presence of walls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In such configurations a horseshoe vortex system appears prior to a bluff body increasing the local shear stress and heat transfer [1] while the flow is characterized by periodic shedding of large-scale vortices behind the body that form the Kármán vortex street. Low-frequency modulations of the recirculating zone are detected for various configurations such as a cylinder [2,3], disk and sphere [4], prism [5], bullet [6], among others. The period is typically 10 ÷ 100 times lower compared to the main vortex shedding frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%