2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8eaf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SCUBA-2 Ultra Deep Imaging EAO Survey (STUDIES). IV. Spatial Clustering and Halo Masses of Submillimeter Galaxies

Abstract: We analyze an extremely deep 450 μm image (1σ=0.56 mJy beam −1) of a ;300 arcmin 2 area in the CANDELS/ COSMOS field as part of the Sub-millimeter Common User Bolometric Array-2 Ultra Deep Imaging EAO Survey. We select a robust (signal-to-noise ratio 4) and flux-limited (4 mJy) sample of 164 submillimeter galaxies (SMGs) at 450 μm that have K-band counterparts in the COSMOS2015 catalog identified from radio or midinfrared imaging. Utilizing this SMG sample and the 4705 K-band-selected non-SMGs that reside wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
(259 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dudzevičiūtė et al 2020). SMGs with flux densities > 1 mJy are relatively rare (∼ 10 −5 cMpc −3 at ∼ 2), peak at cosmic noon ( ∼ 2−3; Chapman et al 2005;Simpson et al 2014;Dudzevičiūtė et al 2020), and have large stellar masses (Swinbank et al 2004;Michałowski et al 2012;da Cunha et al 2015), halo masses (Hickox et al 2012;Chen et al 2016;An et al 2019;Lim et al 2020), gas reservoirs (Riechers et al 2010;Engel et al 2010;Carilli et al 2010;Bothwell et al 2013) and central black hole masses (Alexander et al 2008;Wang et al 2013). However, many of the details of this picture are still uncertain, and often the subject of selection and incompleteness effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dudzevičiūtė et al 2020). SMGs with flux densities > 1 mJy are relatively rare (∼ 10 −5 cMpc −3 at ∼ 2), peak at cosmic noon ( ∼ 2−3; Chapman et al 2005;Simpson et al 2014;Dudzevičiūtė et al 2020), and have large stellar masses (Swinbank et al 2004;Michałowski et al 2012;da Cunha et al 2015), halo masses (Hickox et al 2012;Chen et al 2016;An et al 2019;Lim et al 2020), gas reservoirs (Riechers et al 2010;Engel et al 2010;Carilli et al 2010;Bothwell et al 2013) and central black hole masses (Alexander et al 2008;Wang et al 2013). However, many of the details of this picture are still uncertain, and often the subject of selection and incompleteness effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity differences between these two pairs are within 500 km s −1 . At the projected distances of 20-30 kpc, their velocity differences would suggest that these two pairs are gravitationally bound systems, assuming that SMGs as suggested by clustering analyses reside within halos with masses of ∼10 13 M (Hickox et al 2012;Chen et al 2016;Wilkinson et al 2017;An et al 2019;Lim et al 2020;Stach et al 2021). The redshift differences of the two pairs are both ∆z < 0.02, a definition adopted by some models for physically associated pairs (Hayward et al 2013;Muñoz Arancibia et al 2015).…”
Section: Physically Associated Pairsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, from the point of view of large-scale spatial distribution, statistical measurements of auto-correlation functions of each population have inferred similar correlation lengths, i.e. comparable halo masses, within a wide redshift range of z ∼ 1 − 4 (Myers et al 2006;Porciani & Norberg 2006;Shen et al 2007;Hickox et al 2012;Eftekharzadeh et al 2015;Chen et al 2016a;Wilkinson et al 2017;An et al 2019;Lim et al 2020;Stach et al 2021). A certain level of overlap of the two populations in both space and time can find support from cross-correlation measurements (Wang et al 2015), however, due to low space density of both populations, detailed assessments of their environmental connections, in particular on halo scales, have been difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%