2012
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sculpting humoral immunity through dengue vaccination to enhance protective immunity

Abstract: Dengue viruses (DENV) are the most important mosquito transmitted viral pathogens infecting humans. DENV infection produces a spectrum of disease, most commonly causing a self-limiting flu-like illness known as dengue fever; yet with increased frequency, manifesting as life-threatening dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). Waning cross-protective immunity from any of the four dengue serotypes may enhance subsequent infection with another heterologous serotype to increase the probability of DHF. Decades of effort to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An improved vaccine antigen should contain epitopes that strongly induce neutralizing antibodies without inducing enhancing activities, such as 7F4, and minimize the presence of epitopes that induce enhancing antibodies, such as 3H12. Such an example, an antigen that reduces enhancing antibodies without altering neutralizing antibody induction capacity, was recently developed by manipulating immunodominant epitopes of the fusion peptide and EDIII (61,62). In addition, as suggested in the present study, it may be possible to use epitope manipulation to control IgG subclass profiles of induced antibodies; this is highly desirable, as enhancing activity is reduced, depending on the IgG subclass, in the presence of complement in in vitro assays (35,63).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved vaccine antigen should contain epitopes that strongly induce neutralizing antibodies without inducing enhancing activities, such as 7F4, and minimize the presence of epitopes that induce enhancing antibodies, such as 3H12. Such an example, an antigen that reduces enhancing antibodies without altering neutralizing antibody induction capacity, was recently developed by manipulating immunodominant epitopes of the fusion peptide and EDIII (61,62). In addition, as suggested in the present study, it may be possible to use epitope manipulation to control IgG subclass profiles of induced antibodies; this is highly desirable, as enhancing activity is reduced, depending on the IgG subclass, in the presence of complement in in vitro assays (35,63).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-tailed Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the differences in K d , FRNT 50 , and relative binding activity after low-pH treatment between two groups, and the two-tailed Spearman correlation test was used to determine the relationship between K d and FRNT 50 by GraphPad Prism 5.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AfeI and StuI restriction enzyme sites were incorporated at the 5= and 3= termini of the cDNA amplicons, respectively. cDNA amplicons were digested with the AfeI and StuI enzymes and inserted into the AfeI-and StuI-cutting sites of the pVD1i expression vector plasmid (30) to obtain plasmids pVD2-American, pVD2-American/Asian, pVD2-Cosmopolitan, and pVD2-Sylvatic using DENV-2 strain S14635, BC100/98, BC145/97, and DakHD 10674 as the templates, respectively. A plasmid containing Asian 2 genotype DNA was not constructed because of the sequence similarity between the Asian 1 and Asian 2 genotypes, which have only three commonly shared nonconservative amino acid substitutions when the E-protein sequences are compared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of non-EDIII (EDI-II-and prM-specific) IgG from vaccinated mouse serum was calculated by dividing the endpoint titer obtained from the specific knockout antigen (pVD2-Asian 1/D1 EDIII) by that obtained from WT antigen with the same serum sample. EDIII-specific IgG proportions were calculated from the equation 1 minus the proportion of non-EDIII-specific IgG, as previously described (14,30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation