2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SDG synergy between agriculture and forestry in the food, energy, water and income nexus: reinventing agroforestry?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Agriculture is the primary activity for 2.5 billion people worldwide [3]. According to van Noordwijketal [7], agriculture is essential for achieving the SDGs through the interaction of three broad categories of the SDGs, namely its redistributive power and benefits, sustaining a resources base and demand for human resources appropriation. While Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agriculture is the primary activity for 2.5 billion people worldwide [3]. According to van Noordwijketal [7], agriculture is essential for achieving the SDGs through the interaction of three broad categories of the SDGs, namely its redistributive power and benefits, sustaining a resources base and demand for human resources appropriation. While Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of synthetic work is also needed to help address what seems to be a persistent dichotomy in agroforestry research between studies in ecology and agronomy, which tend to focus on the agricultural productivity and environmental outcomes of agroforestry practices, and studies in international development that emphasize human well-being outcomes of agroforestry interventions.7 | DISCUSSION7.1 | Summary of main resultsAgroforestry has been widely practiced, promoted, and studied across the L&MICs of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Given its prevalence and promise, agroforestry is promoted for its potential to provide a vital contribution to advancing several of the 2030 UN SDGs(Van Noordwijk et al, 2018;Waldron et al, 2017). Indeed, high-level policy documents in many L&MICs now explicitly call for the integration of trees into farming systems (FAO 2013) and international donors have invested billions of dollars in agroforestry interventions around the world (AidData 2017; Tierney et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionality considerations can be grouped under provisioning services (or productivity of land), regulating services (e.g., with respect to water or nitrogen balance) and cultural services (e.g., landscape beauty). WaNuLCAS model outputs were used to calculate two components, LER P for provisioning and LER R for regulating services, of a multifunctional LER M (van Noordwijk et al, 2018). For systems with only two components, as simulated here, the productivity LER P component was calculated as:…”
Section: Scenario Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khasanah et al (2015a) found that LER values up to 1.8 are feasible for teak-maize systems in Central Java. As suggested recently (van Noordwijk et al, 2018), an extended LER M index (with m = multifunctionality) can include further aspects of multifunctionality and ecosystem services beyond commodity production. This can be used to analyse landscape mosaics with monocultures as well as mixed cropping systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%