2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SDOF response model parameters from dynamic blast loading experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 SDOF ANALYSIS Single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) analyses have been used to predict the dynamic response of simple structural components subjected to blast loading [17,18]. An SDOF analysis, assuming a hinge failure at the midpoint of the specimen, a uniformly-distributed load, and simply supported boundary conditions, was created for this test series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 SDOF ANALYSIS Single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) analyses have been used to predict the dynamic response of simple structural components subjected to blast loading [17,18]. An SDOF analysis, assuming a hinge failure at the midpoint of the specimen, a uniformly-distributed load, and simply supported boundary conditions, was created for this test series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The judgment of structural instability or complete fracture is accepted by engineers through method of maximum displacement response of an equivalent SDOF elasto-plastic system. FISCHER and HARING [8] studied the factors influencing SDOF system based on the impacts on structures caused by shock loading. In terms of energy, TERAN et al [9] comprehensively took the factors, related with the design of structure seismic, affecting structure stress and deformation into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith [8] proposed a linear resistance function after glass cracking. Fischer and Häring [10] also conducted analysis of blast experimental data attempting to fit linear resistance functions. They then compared the deflections obtained from single degree of freedom models with those obtained during the experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%