2006
DOI: 10.1088/1009-9271/6/3/02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SDSS J143030.22–001115.1: A Misclassified Narrow-line Seyfert 1 Galaxy with Flat X-ray Spectrum

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We should exclude this kind of object in the statistics of NLS1s. For more details, please refer to Bian, Cui & Chao (2005b). It is still a question whether soft X‐ray photon indices of NLS1s found in SDSS are not too steep compared with those normally observed in NLS1s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should exclude this kind of object in the statistics of NLS1s. For more details, please refer to Bian, Cui & Chao (2005b). It is still a question whether soft X‐ray photon indices of NLS1s found in SDSS are not too steep compared with those normally observed in NLS1s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worth noting that the Gaussian analysis shows a broad Hb component [FWHM(Hb) p 2630 km s Ϫ1 ] that is significantly wider than the nominal NLS1 limit [FWHM(Hb) p 2000 km s Ϫ1 ]. Separating the Balmer lines into a broad and a narrow component has led to a revision of the quality of several objects that were previously misclassified as NLS1's (e.g., Ve ´ron-Cetty et al 2001;Botte et al 2005;Bian et al 2006aBian et al , 2006b. These misclassifications were in part favored by the original definition of NLS1, which did not take into consideration the impact of a varying mix of the broad-and narrow-line components (Osterbrock & Pogge 1985;Goodrich 1989).…”
Section: Sbs 1118ϩ541mentioning
confidence: 99%