2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200600009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SDSS J212531.92–010745.9 – the first definite PG 1159 close binary system

Abstract: Aims. The archival spectrum of SDSS J212531.92−010745.9 shows not only the typical signature of a PG 1159 star, but also indicates the presence of a companion. Our aim was the proof of the binary nature of this object and the determination of its orbital period. Methods. We performed time-series photometry of SDSS J212531.92−010745.9. We observed the object during 10 nights, spread over one month, with the Tübingen 80 cm and the Göttingen 50 cm telescopes. We fitted the observed light curve with a sine and sim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2, we compare the folded profile to the sinusoidal amplitude of 0.299(33) relative intensity change. Clearly, the observed peak-to-peak variation is not fully reproduced by the fit, owing to the broader trough and the narrow maximum already described by Nagel et al (2006), who fitted magnitude changes, while we now fit intensity changes. For a higher fit amplitude and/or raised zero line, the observed Nagel et al (2006) still suffers from a degeneracy in mass and radius for the PG 1159 component, this light curve shape emphasizes the superiority of their more realistic model over a plain sine fit and validates their interpretation of the observed brightening as a reflection effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2, we compare the folded profile to the sinusoidal amplitude of 0.299(33) relative intensity change. Clearly, the observed peak-to-peak variation is not fully reproduced by the fit, owing to the broader trough and the narrow maximum already described by Nagel et al (2006), who fitted magnitude changes, while we now fit intensity changes. For a higher fit amplitude and/or raised zero line, the observed Nagel et al (2006) still suffers from a degeneracy in mass and radius for the PG 1159 component, this light curve shape emphasizes the superiority of their more realistic model over a plain sine fit and validates their interpretation of the observed brightening as a reflection effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Following up the light curve of SDSS J212531.92-010745.9 presented by Nagel et al (2006), we have obtained new observations with the Tübingen 80 cm and the Göttingen 50 cm telescopes during 19 nights between September and November 2006. The full data set now available is listed in Table 1 with details of the set-up.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Should the RV variations in J1556 be confirmed as originating from a close companion, then J1556 would be just the second known PG 1159 close binary system besides SDSS J212531.92−010745.9 (Nagel et al 2006;Schuh et al 2009;Shimansky et al 2015). The companion in the latter system is a low-mass main-sequence star as it is obvious from the reflection effect in the light curve and from the hydrogen Balmer series, which appears in emission owing to the radiation of the PG 1159 star (Nagel et al 2006).…”
Section: The Pg 1159 Star J1556mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter fit was then performed by means of a χ 2 minimization technique with SPAS (Spectrum Plotting and Analysing Suite, Hirsch 2009), which is based on the FITSB2 routine (Napiwotzki 1999). We fitted all Balmer and He ii lines detected in the SDSS spectra of these stars.…”
Section: H-rich Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%