2000
DOI: 10.1039/b005201i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Se–N interactions in selenohydroxylamine: a theoretical study

Abstract: The potential energy surfaces of thiohydroxylamine HS-NH 2 , 1, and selenohydroxylamine HSe-NH 2 , 2, have been searched, using ab initio and density functional methods, to study the conformational preferences. There are two minima on the path of rotation around the Se-N bond in 2. High accuracy G2MP2 calculations showed that the Se-N rotational barrier in 2 is 5.41 kcal mol Ϫ1 , which is 1.16 kcal mol Ϫ1 less than the S-N rotational barrier in 1. The inversion around N in 1 and 2 goes through low energy barri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several previous computational studies on the conformations of NH 2 XH (X = O, S, Se). It is found that the anti - is favored over the syn -conformer by about 5 kcal mol –1 for H 2 NOH, but only by less than 1 kcal mol –1 for H 2 NSH and H 2 NSeH, which can be mainly ascribable to the stronger n (N) → σ*(X–H) (X = S, Se) hyperconjugation in syn , leading to a shorter N–X (X = S, Se) bond length in syn -conformers than those in anti -conformers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several previous computational studies on the conformations of NH 2 XH (X = O, S, Se). It is found that the anti - is favored over the syn -conformer by about 5 kcal mol –1 for H 2 NOH, but only by less than 1 kcal mol –1 for H 2 NSH and H 2 NSeH, which can be mainly ascribable to the stronger n (N) → σ*(X–H) (X = S, Se) hyperconjugation in syn , leading to a shorter N–X (X = S, Se) bond length in syn -conformers than those in anti -conformers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conformational preferences of syn- or anti periplanar structures 8a and 8c have been generally observed in most of the sulfonamides, even in the planar sulfonamides 6 and 7 (cf. Scheme ), and have been rationalized in terms of negative hyperconjugation (anomeric effect) between the nitrogen lone pair and the electron-deficient C−S bond (σ* C−S ). ,, The relevant negative hyperconjugation is suggested theoretically to be strongly enhanced in α-sulfonyl carboanions, which are isoelectronic to pyramidal sulfonamides. , The localization of the nitrogen lone pair in the pyramidal arrangement, which increases the electron-donating ability of the nitrogen nonbonding orbital, was postulated to counterbalance the attenuation of negative hyperconjugation due to the elongation of the N−S bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfenamides are also known to produce diastereomeric compounds according to NMR, where the S–N bond is the chiral axis because of a rotational barrier about S–N. This barrier has been attributed to steric interactions , between N- and S-substituents, and in some cases, a negative hyperconjugative effect between n N → σ* S–C has been suggested but not quantified . Such interactions between lone-pair electrons and σ* S–C orbitals have been exploited to bias specific conformers in drug molecules .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 We demonstrate the existence of an electronic interaction between the −NH 2 lone-pair electrons and the σ* S−C bond via crystallographic and in silico methods. Previously, this proposed interaction was referred to as negative hyperconjugation; 28 however, given that the electronic interaction is ∼4−5 kcal/mol and similar in energy to classical anomeric interactions, this interaction is better described as a true anomeric interaction. We further propose that the poor stability associated with S-unsubstituted sulfenamides (as in 1−3) can, in part, be attributed to a lack of a suitable, low-lying σ* S−C acceptor orbital to stabilize the adjacent S−N bond.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%