2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006jc003541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea surface temperature fronts in the California Current System from geostationary satellite observations

Abstract: Sea surface temperature (SST) fronts are determined for the 2001–2004 time period from Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) data in the California Current System (CCS). The probability of detecting a SST front at an individual pixel location in the CCS is presented as a bi‐monthly climatology. Fronts clearly indicate the seasonal evolution of coastal upwelling, as well as meanders and filaments that are often linked with irregularities in coastline geometry. Winter is characterized by low … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fronts are associated with phytoplankton blooms and aggregate phytoplankton and larvae, and these phenomena are well-documented in central California (Bjorkstedt et al, 2002;Graham et al, 1992;Ryan et al, 2010Ryan et al, , 2014Traganza and Conrad, 1981;Woodson et al, 2009). Fronts are common and persistent in the CCS (Castelao et al, 2006;Shanks et al, 2003a), and are spatially correlated with higher recruitment of both intertidal and subtidal species . However, fronts may also inhibit recruitment locally by preventing larval-rich water from reaching shore (Galarza et al, 2009;McCulloch and Shanks, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fronts are associated with phytoplankton blooms and aggregate phytoplankton and larvae, and these phenomena are well-documented in central California (Bjorkstedt et al, 2002;Graham et al, 1992;Ryan et al, 2010Ryan et al, , 2014Traganza and Conrad, 1981;Woodson et al, 2009). Fronts are common and persistent in the CCS (Castelao et al, 2006;Shanks et al, 2003a), and are spatially correlated with higher recruitment of both intertidal and subtidal species . However, fronts may also inhibit recruitment locally by preventing larval-rich water from reaching shore (Galarza et al, 2009;McCulloch and Shanks, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both of these CCE foraging areas support seasonal dense aggregations of gelatinous prey, e.g., Chrysaora fuscescens and Aurelia spp., in retention areas created by points, headlands, and frontal regions (Shenker 1984, Graham et al 2001. We identified some additional ARS behavior in offshore waters of central and northern California, where SST fronts are pronounced during the boreal spring and summer in deeper offshore regions (Costelao et al 2006). This area was used by several leatherbacks during early summer prior to arriving in neritic waters and by two leatherbacks tagged in PBI that arrived off California during 2006 when delayed upwelling reduced seasonal productivity (Goericke et al 2007) and jelly prey were scarce (S. R. Benson, unpublished data).…”
Section: High-use Foraging Destinationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Oceanic fronts are an important part of the California Current System (CCS) and are vital to the understanding and management of fisheries within the CCS. A recent paper (Castelao et al 2006) evaluated and used the Oceanic Front Probability Index to study the topographical and seasonal influences on the northern CCS off the coast of Oregon. Specific applications include use in the selection of marine protected areas within the National Marine Sanctuaries, as well as inclusion as a core dataset for the West Coast Regional Associations of the Integrated Ocean Observing System.…”
Section: Applications Goes Sst Products Represent Amentioning
confidence: 99%