Sea Trout Fisheries Management: Should we follow the Salmon?

Walker, Alan; Pawson, M. G.; Potter, E.C.E.

doi:10.1002/9780470996027.ch33

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At present, biological reference points (BRPs) have yet to be developed for sea trout, (Walker et al, 2006). BRPs aim to ensure a minimum spawning biomass is maintained such that the stock is conserved, whilst allowing exploitation on the excess (Potter et al, 2003).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sea Trout ( Salmo trutta L.) Exploitation in Five Rivers in England and Wales

Shields

Aprahamian

Bayliss

et al. 2007

Sea Trout: Biology, Conservation and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sea Trout ( Salmo trutta L.) Exploitation in Five Rivers in England and Wales

Shields

Aprahamian

Bayliss

et al. 2007

Sea Trout: Biology, Conservation and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…We highlight ecological similarities and Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, and Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., including steelhead O. mykiss). Consequently, management and conservation plans associated with these trout are less developed and often lack extensive and reliable data (Trotter et al 1993;Walker et al 2004) or evaluation of management strategies currently being utilized. This lack of information is concerning, given their recreational value and role in the ecology of freshwater and nearshore ecosystems (Knutsen et al 2001;Jonsson and Jonsson 2011;Quinn 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anadromous trout from opposite sides of the globe: biology, ocean ecology, and management of anadromous brown and cutthroat trout

Losee,

Palm,

Claiborne

et al. 2023

Rev Fish Biol Fisheries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the northeastern Atlantic Ocean, and coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) in the northeastern Pacific Ocean, are analogs in many ways. Both species display similar patterns of complex life histories and behavioral flexibility, are iteroparous and facultatively anadromous and occupy nearshore coastal marine habitats where numerous populations often mix. These characteristics create specific challenges for management and conservation that have been complicated by inadequate scientific attention in some areas. Both species are declining across their native range, and their ecology make them particularly vulnerable to habitat destruction, fishing, and climate change. Here, we review the available literature to compare the biology, ocean ecology, and management practices of these two species. We highlight ecological similarities and differences between the species and identify current knowledge gaps suggesting future research needs and management actions. Using a comparative approach, the review aims to promote and facilitate knowledge exchange between anadromous trout research communities from opposite sides of the globe to improve management and conservation of these species and stimulate the production of management plans specific to anadromous trout.

show abstract

Sea Trout Fisheries Management: Should we follow the Salmon?

Cited by 2 publications

References 42 publications

Sea Trout ( Salmo trutta L.) Exploitation in Five Rivers in England and Wales

Sea Trout ( Salmo trutta L.) Exploitation in Five Rivers in England and Wales

Anadromous trout from opposite sides of the globe: biology, ocean ecology, and management of anadromous brown and cutthroat trout

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About