2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seamless integration of design and Kirchhoff–Love shell analysis using analysis-suitable unstructured T-splines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare and summarize the convergence plots of the two geometric On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that adaptive mesh refinement is usually the method of choice to recover optimal convergence for problems with irregular solutions. In IGA, T-splines [51][52][53][54], hierarchical B-splines [55][56][57][58][59], and locally-refinable B-splines [60,61] are typical examples in this family of methods.…”
Section: L-shaped Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare and summarize the convergence plots of the two geometric On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that adaptive mesh refinement is usually the method of choice to recover optimal convergence for problems with irregular solutions. In IGA, T-splines [51][52][53][54], hierarchical B-splines [55][56][57][58][59], and locally-refinable B-splines [60,61] are typical examples in this family of methods.…”
Section: L-shaped Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this direction, simultaneously fulfilling the requirements from both design and analysis is a significant challenge. Numerous methods have been developed over the past few years, but among them, only a few constructions can achieve optimal convergence rates in IGA, such as geometrically smooth multipatch construction, 21,22 degenerated Bézier construction, 23‐25 manifold‐based construction, 26 and blended C 0 construction for unstructured hexahedral meshes 27 . A common simplification in all these constructions is to adopt uniform parameterization around extraordinary vertices, that is, the surrounding knot intervals are assumed to be the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isogeometric analysis (IGA), introduced by Hughes et al [1], was originally proposed to bridge the gap between computer-aided geometric design (CAGD) models, which are often constructed using non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) [2] and recently using other spline technologies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], and their corresponding physics-based computational approximation models that are frequently based on Lagrange polynomial representations for the geometry and solution spaces. The essential concept of IGA is to employ the same basis functions that are used in design for numerical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%