2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search capital

Abstract: This paper first documents the extent of return employment: workers returning to employers they worked for previously within the same employment spell. Employer returns are typically involuntary and lead to lower earnings. To understand these features, the paper then develops an equilibrium model of worker recall and on-the-job search in which job seekers hold onto information they acquire about job opportunities as insurance in the event of a job destruction shock. Allowing workers to recall contacts increase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The one exception to this result is that wages with future employers after an unemployment spell are unaffected by specific training. But even that exception is eliminated in settings with for example recall, such as Fujita and Moscarini (2013) and Carrillo-Tudela and Smith (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The one exception to this result is that wages with future employers after an unemployment spell are unaffected by specific training. But even that exception is eliminated in settings with for example recall, such as Fujita and Moscarini (2013) and Carrillo-Tudela and Smith (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Assumption A1.1 would also be violated if workers could recall previous job offers as in Carrillo‐Tudela and Smith (2017). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%