2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.125409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for a local effect in multiatom resonant core excitation in a surface species: Photoemission and photon-stimulated desorption fromN2on Ni(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have observed similar effects in CuO [4] and NiO [6], with either a microscopic resonant photoemission theory [2][3][4] or a macroscopic resonant x-ray optical theory [2,3,6] being able to explain the data. However, beyond these studies are others [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] which have seen such effects in both valence photoemission [7][8][9] and adsorbate emission [10] and claim not to have seen MARPE in x-ray emission and photoemission [11][12][13]. Thus, the experimental results overall leave controversy, with some authors reporting that they were able to observe MARPE, but on the other hand some other authors insist that they were not, which also stimulates several theoretical studies [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have observed similar effects in CuO [4] and NiO [6], with either a microscopic resonant photoemission theory [2][3][4] or a macroscopic resonant x-ray optical theory [2,3,6] being able to explain the data. However, beyond these studies are others [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] which have seen such effects in both valence photoemission [7][8][9] and adsorbate emission [10] and claim not to have seen MARPE in x-ray emission and photoemission [11][12][13]. Thus, the experimental results overall leave controversy, with some authors reporting that they were able to observe MARPE, but on the other hand some other authors insist that they were not, which also stimulates several theoretical studies [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, both the microscopic resonant photoemission model and the RXRO model are found to well reproduce experimental data observed for the case of O 1s emission from MnO 7 on passing the Mn 2p 1/2,3/2 resonances, with the microscopic model also having been shown to explain analogous data for O 1s emission from CuO on passing the Cu 2p 1/2,3/2 resonances 11 . In a more recent study of MARPE effects for N 2 adsorbed on Ni(111), it has been found that N 1s emission on passing the Ni 2p 1/2,3/2 resonances also can be described in terms of the RXRO model 12 ; although this study also attempted to observe short-range MARPE effects that went beyond the RXRO picture, these were not found, at least to within ∼1% in magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although some first measurements and discussions of the effects were influenced by the nonlinearity of a particular detector system utilized [1,3], it has subsequently been shown that the experimental MARPE effects can be predicted with 0953-4075/13/115101+10$33.00 either a microscopic resonant photoemission theory [2][3][4] or a macroscopic resonant x-ray optical theory [2,3,6]. However, the experimental results overall leave controversy [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], with some authors reporting that they were able to observe MARPE [7][8][9][10], but on the other hand others insisting that they were not [11][12][13], which also stimulated several theoretical studies [14,15]. MARPE can be considered as an interatomic resonant Auger (IARA) process in the field of molecular physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%