2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.031802
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for Cosmic-Ray Boosted Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using Recoil Protons at Super-Kamiokande

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis allows a ∼100 keV fermion mass (Yunis et al 2020). On the other hand, promising direct searches of dark matter in terrestrial laboratories, e.g., xenon, krypton, and argon detectors, via the dark matter interactions with ordinary matter, electrons, and nucleons, via kinetic energy recoils or even target ionization have started to look for a dark matter fermion in the tens of keV range (see, e.g., Dror et al 2020;Shakeri et al 2020;Dror et al 2021;Aprile et al 2022;Ge et al 2022;Li et al 2022;Zhang et al 2022;Aalbers et al 2023;Abe et al 2023;Caddell et al 2023;PandaX Collaboration et al 2023;Rebeiro et al 2023;Smirnov & Trautner 2023, and references therein). This is precisely the fermion mass-energy range that we have inferred from combined astrophysical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis allows a ∼100 keV fermion mass (Yunis et al 2020). On the other hand, promising direct searches of dark matter in terrestrial laboratories, e.g., xenon, krypton, and argon detectors, via the dark matter interactions with ordinary matter, electrons, and nucleons, via kinetic energy recoils or even target ionization have started to look for a dark matter fermion in the tens of keV range (see, e.g., Dror et al 2020;Shakeri et al 2020;Dror et al 2021;Aprile et al 2022;Ge et al 2022;Li et al 2022;Zhang et al 2022;Aalbers et al 2023;Abe et al 2023;Caddell et al 2023;PandaX Collaboration et al 2023;Rebeiro et al 2023;Smirnov & Trautner 2023, and references therein). This is precisely the fermion mass-energy range that we have inferred from combined astrophysical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the effect of the nuclear form factor for halo DM can be safely neglected. Note that for CR boosted DM the form factor may play a significant role [40,41].…”
Section: Underground Dm Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraints from XENON10 (orange dotted) and XENON1T (green dotted) [19] calculated using the QEdark code [68] and the constraints from DarkSide-50 [58] on the Migdal effect of halo DM are shown. The constraints from the data of Super-K on the cosmic-ray boosted DM are also shown for comparison [41]. The two red markers represent two benchmark parameter sets of DM particle masses and DM-nucleon scattering cross sections.…”
Section: Constraints On Dm-nucleon Scattering Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still empty-handed, physicists are extending their searches to the lighter end of the possible mass range: below 1 GeV. As part of that effort, the team behind the Super-Kamiokande experiment in Japan have now analyzed more than two decades' worth of data to constrain the properties of dark matter particles with masses between 1 and 300 MeV [1].…”
Section: By Marric Stephensmentioning
confidence: 99%