2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.103.074010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for explanation of the neutron lifetime anomaly

Abstract: The results of measurements performed using UCN storing method are in good agreement. The latest most accurate measurements of the neutron decay asymmetry and neutron lifetime measurements by storage method are in agreement within the Standard Model. However, there is a significant discrepancy at 3.6σ (1% of decay probability) level with beam method experiment. This article discusses the possible causes of discrepancy in the measurements of the neutron lifetime with beam method experiment. The most probable ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The n − n ′ oscillation effects could also manifest in the quasi-free medium of a halo nucleus. One example is 11 Be, a one-neuron halo nucleus. It has a 13.76 second β-decay half-life with a strong β-delayed particle decay (βα) branch of 3.3% [132].…”
Section: Other Possible Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The n − n ′ oscillation effects could also manifest in the quasi-free medium of a halo nucleus. One example is 11 Be, a one-neuron halo nucleus. It has a 13.76 second β-decay half-life with a strong β-delayed particle decay (βα) branch of 3.3% [132].…”
Section: Other Possible Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several Monte Carlo (MC) simulations have been developed to model the early UCN experiments that used material storage bottles [21,22]. These MC simulations have adjusted the corresponding lifetime by a few seconds, reducing the tension between the beam and the bottle lifetime measurements [23,24]. There are no independent simulations verifying the claims of these MCs, however.…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of the lifetime of the neutron with a beam of cold neutrons [29][30][31], which is the main alternative to the measurement with UCNs, gives τ n = (887.7 ± 1.2 [stat] ± 1.9 [syst]) s. The difference of this value from the measurements by other methods is even larger, which is a known unsolved enigma. Possible reasons for this difference are actively sought from ignored errors in experiments with the neutron beams [32] to new decay channels of the neutron [31] or even dark matter [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%