Search for Lorentz and 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math>
 violation using sidereal time dependence of neutrino flavor transitions over a short baseline

Abe, K.; Amey, Jake Lewis; Andreopoulos, C.; Antonova, M.; Aoki, Shigeki; Ariga, A.; Assylbekov, S.; Autiero, D.; Ban, S.; Barbato, F. C. T.; Barbi, M.; Barker, G. J.; Barr, G.; Barry, C.; Bartet-Friburg, P.; Batkiewicz, M.; Berardi, V.; Berkman, S.; Bhadra, S.; Bienstock, S.; Blondel, A.; Bolognesi, S.; Bordoni, S.; Boyd, S. B.; Brailsford, D.; Bravar, A.; Bronner, C.; Avanzini, M. Buizza; Calland, R. G.; Campbell, T.; Cao, S.; Cartwright, S.; Castillo, R.; Catanesi, M G; Cervera, A.; Chappell, A.; Checchia, C.; Cherdack, D.; Chikuma, N.; Christodoulou, G.; Clifton, A.; Coleman, J. P.; Collazuol, G.; Coplowe, D.; Cremonesi, L.; Cudd, A.; Dąbrowska, A.; Rosa, G. De; Dealtry, T.; Denner, P. F.; Dennis, Steve; Densham, C.; Dewhurst, D.; Lodovico, F. Di; Luise, S. Di; Dolan, S.; Drapier, O.; Duffy, K.; Dumarchez, J.; Dunkman, M.; Dziewiecki, M.; Emery-Schrenk, S.; Ereditato, A.; Feusels, T.; Finch, A.; Fiorentini, G. A.; Friend, M.; Fujii, Y.; Fukuda, Daisuke; Fukuda, Y.; Furmanski, A. P.; Galymov, V.; Díaz, Antonio; Giffin, S.; Giganti, C.; Gizzarelli, F.; Golan, T.; Gonin, M.; Grant, N.; Hadley, D. R.; Haegel, L.; Haigh, J. T.; Hamilton, P.; Hansen, D.; Harada, J.; Hara, T.; Hartz, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Hastings, N. C.; Hayashino, T.; Hayato, Y.; Helmer, R. L.; Hierholzer, M.; Hillairet, A.; Himmel, A.; Hiraki, T.; Hiramoto, A.; Hirota, S.; Hogan, M.; Holeczek, J.; Hosomi, F.; Huang, K.; Ichikawa, A. K.; Ieki, K.; Ikeda, M.; Imber, J.; Insler, J.; Intonti, R. A.; Irvine, T. J.; Ishida, Toru; Ishii, T.; Iwai, E.; Iwamoto, K.; Izmaylov, A.; Jacob, Anu; Jamieson, B.; Jiang, M.; Johnson, Steven G.; Jo, J. H.; Jonsson, P.; Jung, C. K.; Kabirnezhad, M.; Kaboth, A.; Kajita, T.; Kakuno, H.; Kameda, J.; Karlen, D.; Karpikov, I.; Katori, T.; Kearns, E.; Khabibullin, M.; Khotjantsev, A.; Kiełczewska, D.; Kikawa, T.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.; King, S.; Kisiel, J.; Knight, A.; Knox, A.; Kobayashi, T.; Koch, L.; Koga, T.; Konaka, A.; Kondo, K.; Kopylov, A.; Kormos, L. L.; Korzenev, A.; Koshio, Y.; Kowalik, K.; Kropp, W. R.; Kudenko, Y.; Kurjata, R.; Kutter, T.; Łagoda, J.; Lamont, I.; Lamoureux, Mathieu; Larkin, E.; Lasorak, P.; Laveder, M.; Lawe, M.; Lazos, M.; Licciardi, M.; Lindner, T.; Liptak, Z.; Litchfield, R. P.; Li, X.; Longhin, A.; Lopez, J. P.; Lou, T.; Ludovici, L.; Lu, X. L.; Magaletti, L.; Mahn, Kendall; Malek, M.; Manly, S.; Maret, L.; Marino, A. D.; Marteau, J.; Martin, J. F.; Martins, P.; Martynenko, S.; Maruyama, T.; Matveev, V.; Mavrokoridis, K.; Y., W.; Mazzucato, E.; McCarthy, M.; McCauley, N.; McFarland, KS; McGrew, C.; Mefodiev, A.; Metelko, C.; Mezzetto, M.; Mijakowski, P.; Minamino, A.; Mineev, O.; Mine, S.; Missert, A.; Miura, M.; Moriyama, S.; Morrison, John H.; Mueller, Th A.; Murphy, S.; Myslik, J.; Nakadaira, T.; Nakahata, M.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, K.; Nakanishi, Yuta; Nakayama, S.; Nakaya, T.; Nakayoshi, K.; Nantais, C.; Nielsen, C.; Nirkko, M.; Nishikawa, K.; Nishimura, Y.; Novella, P.; Nowak, J.; O’Keeffe, H. M.; Ohta, R.; Okumura, K.; Okusawa, T.; Oryszczak, W.; Oser, S. M.; Ovsyannikova, T.; Owen, R. A.; Oyama, Y.; Palladino, V.; Palomino, J. L.; Paolone, V.; Patel, N. D.; Paudyal, P.; Pavin, M.; Payne, D. J.; Perkin, J. D.; Petrov, Y.; Pickard, L.; Pickering, L.; Guerra, E. S. Pinzon; Pistillo, C.; Popov, Б.; Posiadała-Zezula, M.; Poutissou, Jean-Michel; Poutissou, R.; Przewłocki, P.; Quilain, B.; Radermacher, T.; Radicioni, E.; Ratoff, P. N.; Ravonel, M.; Rayner, M.; Redij, A.; Reinherz‐Aronis, E.; Riccio, C.; Rojas, Pablo Fierro; Rondio, E.; Rossi, B.; Roth, Stefan; Rubbia, A.; Ruggeri, A. C.; Rychter, A.; Sacco, R.; Sakashita, K.; Sánchez, Francisca Javiela Muñoz; Sato, F.; Scantamburlo, E.; Scholberg, K.; Schwehr, J.; Scott, M.; Seiya, Y.; Sekiguchi, T.; Sekiya, H.; Sgalaberna, D.; Shah, R.; Shaikhiev, A.; Shaker, F.; Shaw, D.; Shiozawa, M.; Shirahige, T.; Short, S.; Smy, M. B.; Sobczyk, J. T.; Sobel, H. W.; Sorel, M.; Southwell, L.; Stamoulis, P.; Steinmann, J.; Stewart, T.; Stowell, P.; Suda, Y.; Suvorov, S.; Suzuki, A.; Suzuki, K.; Suzuki, Shinji; Suzuki, Y.; Tacik, R.; Tada, M.; Takahashi, Sentaro; Takeda, Atsushi; Takeuchi, Y.; Tamura, Ryo; Tanaka, Hidekazu; Tanaka, Hirohisa; Terhorst, D.; Terri, R.; Thakore, T.; Thompson, L. F.; Tobayama, S.; Toki, W. H.; Tomura, T.; Touramanis, C.; Tsukamoto, T.; Tzanov, M.; Uchida, Y.; Vacheret, A.; Vagins, M. R.; Vallari, Z.; Vasseur, G.; Vilela, C.; Vladisavljevic, T.; Wąchała, T.; Wakamatsu, K.; Walter, C. W.; Wark, D.; Warzycha, W.; Wascko, M. O.; Weber, A.; Wendell, R.; Wilkes, R. J.; Wilking, M. J.; Wilkinson, C.; Wilson, J. R.; Wilson, R. J.; Wret, C.; Yamada, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Yanagisawa, C.; Yano, T.; Yen, S.; Yershov, N.; Yokoyama, M.; Yoo, J.; Yoshida, Kyohei; Yuan, Tzu-Chiang; Yu, M.; Zalewska, A.; Zalipska, J.; Zambelli, L.; Заремба, К.; Ziembicki, M.; Zimmerman, E. D.; Zito, M.; Żmuda, J.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.111101

Cited by 30 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This formalism incorporates various fundamental features of quantum field theories, such as energy-momentum conservation, observer Lorentz transformations, and spin-statistics, however it includes violations of particle Lorentz transformations. A number of neutrino oscillation data sets have been analyzed using this formalism, including LSND [70], Mini-BooNE [71], MINOS [72][73][74][75], Double Chooz [76,77], SNO [78], T2K [79], as well as the aforementioned IceCube-40 and Super-Kamiokande. These experiments can be classified into two groups.…”

Section: Data Availabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Neutrino interferometry for high-precision tests of Lorentz symmetry with IceCube

Aartsen,

Hill,

Kyriacou

et al. 2018

Nature Phys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lorentz symmetry is a fundamental space-time symmetry underlying both the Standard Model of particle physics and general relativity. This symmetry guarantees that physical phenomena are observed to be the same by all inertial observers. However, unified theories, such as string theory, allow for violation of this symmetry by inducing new space-time structure at the quantum gravity scale. Thus, the discovery of Lorentz symmetry violation could be the first hint of these theories in Nature. Here we report the results of the most precise test of space-time symmetry in the neutrino sector to date. We use high-energy atmospheric neutrinos observed at the IceCube Neutrino Observatory to search for anomalous neutrino oscillations as signals of Lorentz violation. We find no evidence for such phenomena. This allows us to constrain the size of the dimension-four

show abstract

Section: Data Availabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Neutrino interferometry for high-precision tests of Lorentz symmetry with IceCube

Aartsen,

Hill,

Kyriacou

et al. 2018

Nature Phys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lorentz violation can also induce time variability of the neutrino oscillation [349]. Effects could be observed in short and long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments which ought to provide strong constraints lower-dimensional operators [347,[349][350][351][352][353][354][355][356][357][358][359].…”

Section: Lorentz Violationmentioning

confidence: 99%

White Paper on New Opportunities at the Next-Generation Neutrino Experiments (Part 1: BSM Neutrino Physics and Dark Matter)

Argüelles

Aurisano

Batell

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors of this paper primarily consist of those who participated in the New Opportunities at Next-Generation Neutrino Experiments workshop held on the campus of the University of Texas at Arlington. Given the anticipated and growing importance of BSM topics that can be explored in the next-generation neutrino experiments, the authors of this white paper are strong advocates of these topics and aim to become a de facto working group for the upcoming decadal study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields. This white paper is the first step to accomplish these goals, and provides a benchmark for ourselves to check progress toward making BSM physics a primary, yet complementary, topical area to precision neutrino oscillation parameter measurements. The authors plan to follow up this white paper and workshop with the subsequent series to ensure continued improvement and broadening of the BSM topics accessible to neutrino experiments, and to draw increasing attention to this field throughout the future. New Opportunities at the Next-Generation Neutrino Experiments White Paper New Opportunities at the Next-Generation Neutrino Experiments White Paper

show abstract

“…Up to now neutrino experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have reported limits on the four sidereal amplitudes ðA s Þcd; ðA c Þcd; ðB s Þcd and ðB c Þcd. Even when considering individual flavor pairs, the number of direction-dependent parameters precluded these experiments from setting limits on individual coefficients, except through the method of fitting one coefficient at a time while arbitrarily setting all others to zero.…”

Section: Analysis On Lv-cptv Coefficientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This would produce a time-varying neutrino oscillation probability associated with the Earth's orbital and rotational movement relative to the fixed stars, and therefore a period of a sidereal day (23 h 56 min 4.09 sec). Accordingly, a sidereal time dependence has been sought in the oscillation probability of accelerator neutrinos [12][13][14][15][16][17], atmospheric neutrinos [18] and reactor neutrinos [19]. The SME also predicts deviations from the standard L=E oscillation behavior.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Search for a time-varying electron antineutrino signal at Daya Bay

Adey¹,

An²,

Balantekin³

et al. 2018

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A search for a time-varyingν e signal was performed with 621 days of data acquired by the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment over 704 calendar days. The time spectrum of the measuredν e flux normalized to its prediction was analyzed with a Lomb-Scargle periodogram, which yielded no significant signal for periods ranging from 2 hours to nearly 2 years. The normalized time spectrum was also fit for a sidereal modulation under the Standard Model Extension (SME) framework to search for Lorentz and CPT violation (LV-CPTV). Limits were obtained for all six flavor pairsēμ;ēτ,μτ,ēē;μμ andττ by fitting them one at a time, constituting the first experimental constraints on the latter three. Daya Bay's high statistics and unique layout of multiple directions from three pairs of reactors to three experimental halls allowed the simultaneous constraint of individual SME LV-CPTV coefficients without assuming others contribute negligibly, a first for a neutrino experiment.

show abstract

Search for Lorentz and CPT violation using sidereal time dependence of neutrino flavor transitions over a short baseline

Cited by 30 publications

References 25 publications

Neutrino interferometry for high-precision tests of Lorentz symmetry with IceCube

Neutrino interferometry for high-precision tests of Lorentz symmetry with IceCube

White Paper on New Opportunities at the Next-Generation Neutrino Experiments (Part 1: BSM Neutrino Physics and Dark Matter)

Search for a time-varying electron antineutrino signal at Daya Bay

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About