1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.40.840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for Neutral-Weak-Current Effects in the NucleusF18

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus this system isolates the ∆I = 1 PNC mixing of greatest interest. The results from the four experiments are in good agreement [23][24][25][26] …”
Section: Experimental Summarysupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus this system isolates the ∆I = 1 PNC mixing of greatest interest. The results from the four experiments are in good agreement [23][24][25][26] …”
Section: Experimental Summarysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The Danilov limit, retention of the lowest order contribution corresponding to S↔P amplitudes, corresponds to the first term in the expansion where the identification e −mr 4πr ↔ 1 m 2 δ( r) is made in Eq. (23). [Whether one considers the delta function written above as a true delta function or the representation of a "fuzzy" one, m 2 e −mr /4πr, is really a matter of taste [55], in that PNC will always be treated perturbatively.…”
Section: The Ddh Potential and Its S−p Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted best value for h 1 π is 4.7 × 10 −7 [29]. The most sensitive experiments designed to search for the ∆I = 1 weak NN channel using the 18 F γ-ray circular polarization [42] did not see any effect. Coupled with theoretical arguments [43] made in the context of the DDH model one infers h 1 π ≤ 1.2 × 10 −7 .…”
Section: Npdgamma Theorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…ray could be smaller than 10~5, many possible sources of even tiny instrumental asymmetries must be considered. 3 "" 5 Among the instrumental effects, those correlated with the magnetization sense, such as synchronous beam bending, are expected to introduce spurious asymmetries in the results. From magnetic field measurements the synchronous displacement of the beam spot was estimated to be less than 2 //,m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%