2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00561-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for new cyclic AMP‐binding proteins

Abstract: Today, there is evidence that the cAMP-dependent kinases (PKA) are not the only intracellular receptors involved in intracellular cAMP signalling in eukaryotes. Other cAMPbinding proteins have been recently identi¢ed, including some cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP) proteins. All these proteins bind cAMP through conserved cyclic nucleotide monophosphatebinding domains. However, all putative cAMP-binding proteins having such domains, as revealed by computer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, today there is evidence that the cAMP-dependent kinases are not the only intracellular receptors involved in intracellular cAMP signaling in eukaryotes. Other cAMP-binding proteins have been identified, including some cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP) proteins (Dremier et al 2003). Cyclic AMPbinding proteins that do not correspond to the PKA regu-latory subunits have been described in T. cruzi (RangelAldao et al 1988) and in Leishmania (Banerjee & Sarkar 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, today there is evidence that the cAMP-dependent kinases are not the only intracellular receptors involved in intracellular cAMP signaling in eukaryotes. Other cAMP-binding proteins have been identified, including some cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP) proteins (Dremier et al 2003). Cyclic AMPbinding proteins that do not correspond to the PKA regu-latory subunits have been described in T. cruzi (RangelAldao et al 1988) and in Leishmania (Banerjee & Sarkar 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are a number of other signalling processes and proteins that may also be targeted by cAMP-GEFs, indicating the need to elucidate the functional significance of these novel pathways [218]. Nevertheless, cAMP-GEFs are now being widely examined with a view to explaining the increasing number of observations of cAMP-dependent PKA-independent effects, especially since a number of other putative cAMP-binding proteins do not seem to bind cAMP [222].…”
Section: Giembycz and R Newtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two isoforms of PKA, PKA I and II, which are ubiquitously expressed and play a crucial role in cell metabolism, growth and other functions, through phosphorylation of numerous target proteins [3]. PKAs were thought to be the major effectors of cAMP until the discovery of Epacs, guanine nucleotide exchange factors directly activated by cAMP, which have been shown to activate the small G proteins Rap1 and Rap2 [3]. Epac1 has one and Epac2 has two binding sites for cAMP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4]. Epacs have been shown to affect diverse cellular functions including hormone/ transmitter secretion and cell adhesion [3,4]. Cellular gradients of cAMP are generated by the combined actions of adenylate cyclases and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%