Search for New Gauge Bosons Decaying into Dileptons in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>¯</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">p</mml:mi></mml:math>Collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>}</mml:mo><mml:mspace /><mml:mo>=</

Abe, F.; Akimoto, H.; Akopian, A.; Albrow, M.; Amendolia, S. R.; Amidei, D.; Antos̆, J.; Aota, S.; Apollinari, G.; Asakawa, T.; Ashmanskas, W.; Ataç, M.; Azfar, F.; Azzi, P.; Bacchetta, N.; Badgett, W.; Bagdasarov, S.; Bailey, M. W.; Bao, J.; Barbaro, P. de; Barbaro‐Galtieri, A.; Barnes, V. E.; Barnett, B. A.; Barone, M.; Barzi, E.; Bauer, G.; Baumann, Thomas; Bedeschi, F.; Behrends, S.; Belforte, S.; Bellettini, G.; Bellinger, J.; Benjamin, D.; Benlloch, J.; Bensinger, J. R.; Benton, D.; Beretvas, A.; Berge, J. P.; Berryhill, J. W.; Bertolucci, S.; Bevensee, B.; Bhatti, A.; Biery, K.; Binkley, M.; Bisello, D.; Blair, R. E.; Blocker, C.; Bodek, A.; Bokhari, W.; Bolognesi, V.; Bolla, G.; Bortoletto, D.; Boudreau, J.; Breccia, L.; Bromberg, C.; Bruner, N.; Buckley-Geer, E.; Budd, H. S.; Burkett, K.; Busetto, G.; Byon-Wagner, A.; Byrum, K. L.; Cammerata, J.; Campagnari, C.; Campbell, M.; Caner, A.; Carithers, W.; Carlsmith, D.; Castro, A.; Cauz, D.; Cen, Y.; Cervelli, F.; Chang, P.; Chao, H. Y.; Chapman, J.; Cheng, M. T.; Chiarelli, G.; Chikamatsu, T.; Chiou, C. N.; Christofek, L.; Cihangir, S.; Clark, A.; Cobal, M.; Cocca, E.; Contreras, M.; Conway, J.; Cooper, J.; Cordelli, M.; Couyoumtzelis, C.; Crane, D.; Cronin-Hennessy, D.; Culbertson, R.; Daniels, T.; DeJongh, F.; Delchamps, S.; Dell’Agnello, S.; Dell’Orso, M.; Démina, R.; Demortier, L.; Deninno, M.; Derwent, P. F.; Devlin, T.; Dittmann, J.; Donati, S.; Done, J.; Dorigo, T.; Dunn, A.; Eddy, N.; Einsweiler, K.; Elias, J. E.; Ely, R.; Engels, E.; Errede, D.; Errede, S.; Fan, Q.; Feild, G.; Ferretti, C.; Fiori, I.; Flaugher, B.; Foster, G. W.; Franklin, M.; Frautschi, M.; Freeman, J.; Friedman, J.; Frisch, H.; Fukui, Y.; Funaki, S.; Galeotti, S.; Gallinaro, M.; Ganel, O.; Garcia-Sciveres, M.; Garfinkel, A. F.; Geer, S.; Gerdes, D. W.; Giannetti, P.; Giokaris, N.; Giromini, P.; Giusti, G.; Gladney, L.; Glenzinskí, D.; Gold, M.; Gonzalez, J. Suarez; Gordon, A.; Goshaw, A. T.; Gotra, Y.; Goulianos, K.; Grassmann, H.; Groer, L.; Grosso-Pilcher, C.; Guillian, G.; Guo, R. S.; Haber, C.; Hafen, E.; Hahn, S. R.; Hamilton, R.; Handler, R.; Hans, R. M.; Happacher, F.; Hara, K.; Hardman, A. D.; Harral, B.; Harris, R. M.; Hauger, S. A.; Hauser, J.; Hawk, C.; Hayashi, E.; Heinrich, J.; Hinrichsen, B.; Hoffman, K. D.; Hohlmann, M.; Holck, C.; Hollebeek, R.; Holloway, L.; Hong, S. J.; Houk, G.; Hu, P.; Huffman, B. T.; Hughes, R.; Huston, J.; Huth, J.; Hylen, J.; Ikeda, H.; Incagli, M.; Incandela, J.; Introzzi, G.; Iwai, J.; Iwata, Y.; Jensen, H.; Joshi, U.; Kadel, R. W.; Kajfasz, E.; Kambara, H.; Kamon, T.; Kaneko, T.; Karr, K.; Kasha, H.; Kato, Y.; Keaffaber, T. A.; Kelley, K.; Kennedy, R. D.; Kephart, R.; Kesten, P.; Kestenbaum, D.; Keutelian, H.; Keyvan, F.; Kharadia, B.; Kim, B. J.; Kim, D. H.; Kim, H. S.; Kim, S. B.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, Y. K.; Kirsch, L.; Koehn, P.; Kondo, K.; Königsberg, J.; Köpp, S.; Kordas, K.; Korytov, A.; Koska, W.; Kovacs, E.; Kowald, W.; Krasberg, M.; Kroll, J.; Kruse, M.; Kuwabara, T.; Kuhlmann, S. E.; Kuns, E.; Laasanen, A. T.; Lami, S.; Lammel, S.; Lamoureux, J.I.; Lancaster, M.; LeCompte, T.; Leone, S.; Lewis, J. D.; Limon, P.; Lindgren, M.; Liss, T. M.; Liu, J. B.; Liu, Y. C.; Lockyer, N. S.; Long, O. R.; Loomis, C.; Loreti, M.; Lu, J.; Lucchesi, D.; Lukens, P.; Lusin, S.; Lys, J.; Maeshima, K.; Maghakian, A.; Maksimović, P.; Mangano, M.; Mansour, J.; Mariotti, M.; Marriner, J. P.; Martín, A.; Matthews, J.; Mattingly, R.; McIntyre, P.; Mélèse, P.; Menzione, A.; Meschi, E.; Metzler, S.; Miao, C.; Miao, T.; Michail, G.; Miller, R.; Minato, H.; Miscetti, S.; Mishina, M.; Mitsushio, H.; Miyamoto, T.; Miyashita, S.; Moggi, N.; Morita, Y.; Mukherjee, A.; Müller, Th.; Murat, P.; Nakada, H.; Nakano, I.; Nelson, Charles A.; Neuberger, D.; Newman-Holmes, C.; Ngan, C. Y.P.; Ninomiya, M.; Nodulman, L.; Oh, S. H.; Ohl, K. E.; Ohmoto, T.; Ohsugi, T.; Oishi, R.; Okabe, M.; Okusawa, T.; Oliveira, Rui de; Olsen, J.; Pagliarone, C.; Paoletti, R.; Papadimitriou, V.; Pappas, S. P.; Parashar, N.; Park, Sung Keun; Parri, A.; Patrick, J.; Pauletta, G.; Paulini, M.; Perazzo, A.; Pescara, L.; Peters, Michael; Phillips, T. J.; Piacentino, G.; Pillai, M.; Pitts, K.; Plunkett, R.; Pondrom, L.; Proudfoot, J.; Ptohos, F.; Punzi, G.; Ragan, K.; Reher, D.; Ribon, A.; Rimondi, F.; Ristori, L.; Robertson, W. J.; Rodrigo, T.; Rolli, S.; Romano, J.; Rosenson, L.; Roser, R.; Saab, T.; Sakumoto, W. K.; Saltzberg, D.; Sansoni, A.; Santi, L.; Sato, H.; Schlabach, P.; Schmidt, E. E.; Schmidt, M. P.; Scribano, A.; Segler, S.; Seidel, S. C.; Seiya, Y.; Sganos, G.; Shapiro, M.; Shaw, N. M.; Shen, Qing; Shepard, P. F.; Shimojima, M.; Shochet, M. J.; Siegrist, J.; Sill, A.; Sinervo, P.; Singh, P.; Skarha, J.; Sliwa, K.; Snider, F. D.; Song, T.; Spalding, J.; Speer, T.; Sphicas, P.; Spinella, F.; Spiropulu, M.; Spiegel, L.; Stančo, L.; Steele, J.; Stefanini, A.; Strahl, K.; Strait, J.; Ströhmer, R.; Stuart, D.; Sullivan, G. W.; Sumorok, K.; Suzuki, Junya; Takada, Tomoya; Takahashi, T.; Takano, T.; Takikawa, K.; Tamura, N.; Tannenbaum, B.; Tartarelli, G. F.; Taylor, W.; Teng, P. K.; Teramoto, Y.; Tether, S.; Theriot, D.; Thomas, T. L.; Thun, R. P.; Thurman‐Keup, R.; Timko, M.; Tipton, P.; Titov, A.; Tkaczyk, S.; Toback, D.; Tollefson, K.; Tollestrup, A.; Toyoda, H.; Trischuk, W.; Trocóniz, Jorge F de; Truitt, S.; Tseng, J.; Turini, N.; Uchida, T.; Uemura, N.; Ukegawa, F.; Unal, G.; Valls, J.; Brink, S. C. van den; Vejcik, S.; Velev, G.; Vidal, R.; Vilar, R.; Vondráček, M.; Vucinic, D.; Wagner, R. G.; Wagner, R. L.; Wahl, H. D.; Wallace, N. B.; Walsh, A. M.; Wang, C.; Wang, C. H.; Wang, J.; Wang, M. J.; Wang, Q. F.; Warburton, A.; Watts, T.; Webb, R.; Wei, C.; Wenzel, H.; Wester, W. C.; Wicklund, A. B.; Wicklund, E.; Wilkinson, R.; Williams, H. H.; Wilson, P.; Winer, B. L.; Winn, D.; Wolinski, D.; Wolinski, J.; Worm, S. D.; Wu, X.; Wyss, J.; Yagil, A.; Yao, W-M.; Yasuoka, K.; Ye, Y.; Yeh, G. P.; Yeh, P.; Yin, M.; Yoh, J.; Yosef, C.; Yoshida, T.; Yovanovitch, D.; Yu, I.; Yu, L.; Yun, J. C.; Zanetti, A.; Zetti, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Zucchelli, S.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.2192

Cited by 150 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From Eqs. (17)-(20) it is possible to find limits on the rest of the left-right parameters: These results are comparable with previous LEPI analyses (M Z 2 ≥ 0.8 ÷ 1.5 TeV) [16] and better than that which follow from direct searches for additional gauge bosons in hadron colliders (M Z 2 ≥ 630 GeV) [17]. Finally, let us comment on the approximation made in Eqs.…”

Section: Z Mass and Low-energy Neutral Current Experimentssupporting

confidence: 83%

Low energy physics and left-right symmetry: bounds on the model parameters

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In any gauge model with spontaneous symmetry breakdown the gauge boson masses and their mixings are not independent quantities. They are interconnected through the vacuum expectation values (VEVs) of the Higgs sector. We discuss the low-energy experiments, namely electron-hadron, neutrino-hadron and neutrinoelectron processes in the frame of the Manifest Left-Right Symmetric model and show the impact of these dependencies on the possible heavy gauge boson masses and mixings. At 90 % C.L., we obtain M Z 2 ≥ 1475 GeV for phenomenologically favorable models, without W L − W R mixing and M Z 2 ≥ 1205 GeV in the other extreme case when a maximal mixing is possible. If we consider the left-right symmetric model parameters without any constraints from the Higgs sector these limits get down to 410 GeV. Bounds on the Z 2 mixing angle as well as the W 2 mass and its mixing angle are also given.

show abstract

Section: Z Mass and Low-energy Neutral Current Experimentssupporting

confidence: 83%

Low energy physics and left-right symmetry: bounds on the model parameters

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also shown are the additional constraints in minimal Higgs scenarios for several VEV ratios as discussed in the text. The lower direct production limits from CDF [28] are also shown. They assume that all exotic decay channels are closed, and have to be relaxed by about 100 to 150 GeV when all exotic decays (including channels involving superparticles) are kinematically allowed [28].…”

Section: Quantitymentioning

confidence: 96%

“…The lower direct production limits from CDF [28] are also shown. They assume that all exotic decay channels are closed, and have to be relaxed by about 100 to 150 GeV when all exotic decays (including channels involving superparticles) are kinematically allowed [28]. v 2 +v 2 is fixed by the measured value of the Fermi constant.…”

Section: Quantitymentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Constraints on extended neutral gauge structures

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indirect precision data are used to constrain the masses of possible extra Z ′ bosons and their mixings with the ordinary Z. We study a variety of Z ′ bosons as they appear in E 6 and left-right unification models, the sequential Z boson, and the example of an additional U (1) in a concrete model from heterotic string theory. In all cases the mixings are severely constrained (sin θ < 0.01). The lower mass limits are generally of the order of several hundred GeV and competitive with collider bounds. The exception is the Z ψ boson, whose vector couplings vanish and whose limits are weaker. The results change little when the ρ parameter is allowed, which corresponds to a completely arbitrary Higgs sector. On the other hand, in specific models with minimal Higgs structures the limits are generally pushed into the TeV region.The possibility of additional neutral gauge bosons, Z ′ s, is among the best motivated types of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). They are predicted by most unifying theories, such as Grand Unified Theories (GUTs), left-right unification, superstring theories and their strong coupling generalizations. In many cases their masses remain unpredicted and may or may not be of the electroweak scale. In the context of superstring models, however, which are much more constrained than purely field theoretical models, they are often predicted to arise at the electroweak scale, as we will discuss below. In this paper we consider six different types of Z ′ bosons:1. The Z χ boson is defined by SO(10) → SU(5) × U(1) χ . This boson is also the unique solution to the conditions of (i) family universality, (ii) no extra matter other than the right-handed neutrino, (iii) absence of gauge and mixed gauge/gravitational anomalies, and (iv) orthogonality to the hypercharge generator. In the context of a minimal SO(10) GUT, conditions (i) and (ii) are satisfied by assumption, while (iii) and (iv) are automatic. Relaxing condition (iv) allows other solutions (including the Z LR below) which differ from the Z χ by a shift proportional to the third component of the right-handed isospin generator.2. The Z ψ boson is defined by E 6 → SO(10)×U(1) ψ . It possesses only axial-vector couplings to the ordinary fermions. As a consequence it is the least constrained of our examples.

show abstract

“…This ratio would push the value of M Z 2 above 600 GeV , if g Y ′ = g Y were the case. One notes that the recent Tevatron result [18] giving M Z 2 ≥ 590 GeV would be well satisfied if g Y ′ were equal to g Y .…”

Section: Numerical Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

One-loop effects in supergravity models with an additional U(1)

Demir

Pak

1998

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For an Abelian extended supergravity model, we investigate some important low-energy parameters: tan ␤, the Z-ZЈ mixing angle, lightest CP-even Higgs mass bound, ZЈ mass, and effective parameter. By integrating the renormalization group equations from the string scale down to the weak scale we constuct the scalar potential and analyze the quantities above at the tree-and one-loop levels by including the contributions of top squarks and top quark in the effective potential. ͓S0556-2821͑98͒02211-5͔ PACS number͑s͒: 04.65.ϩe, 12.60.Jv

show abstract

Search for New Gauge Bosons Decaying into Dileptons inp¯pCollisions ats}=

Cited by 150 publications

References 25 publications

Low energy physics and left-right symmetry: bounds on the model parameters

Low energy physics and left-right symmetry: bounds on the model parameters

Constraints on extended neutral gauge structures

One-loop effects in supergravity models with an additional U(1)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About