2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.79.112001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for theZ(4430)atBABAR

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also extracted the product of branching fractions as However, this signal was not seen in the following BaBar experiment, which analyzed both π − J/ψ and π − ψ(3686) invariant masses in B 0,− → K +,0 π − J/ψ and B 0,− → K +,0 π − ψ(3686) decays [105], respectively. The results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: +30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also extracted the product of branching fractions as However, this signal was not seen in the following BaBar experiment, which analyzed both π − J/ψ and π − ψ(3686) invariant masses in B 0,− → K +,0 π − J/ψ and B 0,− → K +,0 π − ψ(3686) decays [105], respectively. The results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: +30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of the X(3872) has led to a resurgence of interest in exotic spectroscopy and subsequently many new states have been claimed. [547][548][549], and not confirmed by BaBar [550,551]. The nature of these states has drawn much theoretical attention and many models have been proposed.…”
Section: Exotic Meson Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is worth inspecting the Λ 0 b → J=ψpK − data with an approach that is model independent with respect to K − p contributions. Such a method was introduced by the BABAR Collaboration [13] and later improved upon by the LHCb Collaboration [14]. There it was used to examineB 0 → ψð2SÞπ þ K − decays, which are dominated by kaon excitations decaying to K − π þ , in order to understand whether the data require the presence of the tetraquark candidate decay, Zð4430Þ þ → ψð2SÞπ þ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%