1979
DOI: 10.1086/157409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for X-ray emission from bursting radio sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprising since Mrk231 is formally a radio-quiet quasar, and more precisely, a BALQSO in which the radio jets are typically suppressed (although see Becker et al 1997). Given a time variability brightness temperature of T b = (12.4 ± 3.5)×10 12 K and the need to avoid the inverse Compton catastrophe (Marscher et al 1979;Ghosh & Punsly 2007), Reynolds et al (2009Reynolds et al ( , 2013 constrained the jet angle to be less than θ max = -+ 25.6 2.2 3.2 from the line of sight. This implies a nearly face-on view of the inner accretion disk, assuming the jet is directed along the rotation axis of the inner disk.…”
Section: Physical Model-revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is surprising since Mrk231 is formally a radio-quiet quasar, and more precisely, a BALQSO in which the radio jets are typically suppressed (although see Becker et al 1997). Given a time variability brightness temperature of T b = (12.4 ± 3.5)×10 12 K and the need to avoid the inverse Compton catastrophe (Marscher et al 1979;Ghosh & Punsly 2007), Reynolds et al (2009Reynolds et al ( , 2013 constrained the jet angle to be less than θ max = -+ 25.6 2.2 3.2 from the line of sight. This implies a nearly face-on view of the inner accretion disk, assuming the jet is directed along the rotation axis of the inner disk.…”
Section: Physical Model-revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2), the variability time scales summarized in Table 6 imply very compact emission regions, and hence very high intrinsic brightness temperatures. Following Marscher et al (1979), and taking an isotropically expanding light-sphere without preferred direction into account, the light travel time argument implies a diameter d ≤ 2 · cΔ t of the emitting region after the time interval Δt [s] of expansion. We then obtain for the diameter of the variable emission region θ [mas]:…”
Section: Variability Time Scales and Brightness Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently the SF/ACF methods deliver variability time scale of 3−4 days, which owing to the limited total observing time must formally be regarded as lower limits to the true variability time scale t var . In these cases we make use of the following definition of the time scale t var to obtain better estimates of the "true" variability time scales directly from those time series where only a several day trend was observed (see also Marscher et al 1979, and references therein): 5) where S denotes the mean flux density [Jy] and ΔS = S max − S min the flux density variation in the considered time interval Δt. We note that this time scale relies on a "visual" inspection of the variability curves, defining by human eye (or mathematically via differentiation) the minimum and maximum of the flux density and the corresponding time interval Δt between these two flux density levels.…”
Section: Appendix A: Statistical Variability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was shown that the predicted X-ray flux density from SSC in a compact, spherical, variable radio source must be reduced by a factor of δ 2(3α+5) if variability is used to measure the size, and the observed self-absorption turn-over frequency is used to estimate the magnetic-field strength [85,86].…”
Section: Effects Of Bulk Relativistic Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%