2007
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/19/17/176208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search of low-dimensional magnetics on the basis of structural data: spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic zigzag chain compounds In2VO5, β-Sr(VOAsO4)2, (NH4,K)2VOF4and α-ZnV3O8

Abstract: A new technique for searching low-dimensional compounds on the basis of structural data is presented. The sign and strength of all magnetic couplings at distances up to 12 Å in five predicted new antiferromagnetic zigzag spin-1/2 chain compounds In(2)VO(5), β-Sr(VOAsO(4))(2), (NH(4))(2)VOF(4), K(2)VOF(4) and α-ZnV(3)O(8) were calculated. It was stated that in the compound In(2)VO(5) zigzag spin chains are frustrated, since the ratio (α = J(2)/J(1)) of competing antiferromagnetic (AF) nearest- (J(1)) and AF nex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, electronic structure calculations using density functional theory indicate that the experimental room-temperature crystal structure of the zigzag spinchain compound In 2 VO 5 is incompatible with both antiferromagnetic intrachain and interchain coupling. Ferromagnetism is stabilized instead, which contradicts the crystal chemical estimates by Volkova [5]. This discrepancy probably traces back to hybridization between the V 3d and O 2p states, as reflected by remarkable oxygen magnetic moments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, electronic structure calculations using density functional theory indicate that the experimental room-temperature crystal structure of the zigzag spinchain compound In 2 VO 5 is incompatible with both antiferromagnetic intrachain and interchain coupling. Ferromagnetism is stabilized instead, which contradicts the crystal chemical estimates by Volkova [5]. This discrepancy probably traces back to hybridization between the V 3d and O 2p states, as reflected by remarkable oxygen magnetic moments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Senegas et al [4] by means of single crystal x-ray analysis at room temperature. Figure 1 Sign and strength of the magnetic coupling constants in In 2 VO 5 very recently have been analyzed by Volkova [5] based on a phenomenological theoretical method for quantitatively estimating the magnetic coupling in lowdimensional crystalline compounds. The only input into the calculation is the crystal structure [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The compound In 2 VO 5 was first prepared both in polycrystalline and single crystalline form by Senegas and the single crystal structure was reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Recent band structure calculations showed, however, that the room temperature crystal structure was incompatible with antiferromagnetic interactions and claimed that both J 1 and J 2 should be ferromagnetic instead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Recently based on crystal chemical analysis, the orthorhombic (P nma) compound In 2 VO 5 has been proposed to be a S = 1/2 zig-zag spin chain compound with competing nearest (J 1 ) and next nearest neighbor (J 2 ) antiferromagnetic exchange couplings between V 4+ moments. 9 The compound In 2 VO 5 was first prepared both in polycrystalline and single crystalline form by Senegas and the single crystal structure was reported. 10 The crystal structure is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%