Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators

Abstract

BackgroundThe optimal retrieval of a literature search in biomedicine depends on the appropriate use of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), descriptors and keywords among authors and indexers. We hypothesized that authors, investigators and indexers in four biomedical databases are not consistent in their use of terminology in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM).MethodsBased on a research question addressing the validity of spinal palpation for the diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction, we developed four search concepts with their respective controlled vocabulary and key terms. We calculated the frequency of MeSH, descriptors, and keywords used by authors in titles and abstracts in comparison to standard practices in semantic and analytic indexing in MEDLINE, MANTIS, CINAHL, and Web of Science.ResultsMultiple searches resulted in the final selection of 38 relevant studies that were indexed at least in one of the four selected databases. Of the four search concepts, validity showed the greatest inconsistency in terminology among authors, indexers and investigators. The use of spinal terms showed the greatest consistency. Of the 22 neuromuscular dysfunction terms provided by the investigators, 11 were not contained in the controlled vocabulary and six were never used by authors or indexers. Most authors did not seem familiar with the controlled vocabulary for validity in the area of neuromuscular dysfunction. Recently, standard glossaries have been developed to assist in the research development of manual medicine.ConclusionsSearching biomedical databases for CAM is challenging due to inconsistent use of controlled vocabulary and indexing procedures in different databases. A standard terminology should be used by investigators in conducting their search strategies and authors when writing titles, abstracts and submitting keywords for publications.

Collaborative information synthesis I: A model of information behaviors of scientists in medicine and public health

“…Our data reveal that scientists are aware of these indexing inadequacies and that they use a multiple-strategy approach to overcome existing retrieval limitations. This behavior has been reported in other studies as well (Murphy et al, 2003a(Murphy et al, , 2003b. The medical group used five search TABLE 2.…”

Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research

“…For example, Evans 108 highlighted the particular difficulties of searching electronic databases for reports of qualitative studies arising because of the nature of the titles, the content of the abstracts and the indexing practices 111 of those preparing the databases. Evans 108 pointed out that the titles given to qualitative work, although often very descriptive of the study's focus, may not easily lend themselves to the selection of specific key terms.…”

Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: explanation and elaboration

“…Interpretation Generalizability 21 Generalizability (external validity) of trial results. Overall evidence 22 General interpretation of the results in the context of current evidence. 1.…”

“…Studies indicate that searching for CAM-related topics is challenging due to the diversity of use of controlled vocabulary and indexing procedures between different databases [22]. It has been suggested that if authors of CAM trials (e.g., botanical medicine trials) report abstracts or titles without reference to standard controlled vocabulary, indexers may not assign appropriate indexing terms for particular studies [22,23].…”