Searching for cures: Inner-city and rural patients' awareness and perceptions of cancer clinical trials

Abstract

Fewer than 5% of cancer patients participate in clinical trials, making it challenging to test new therapies or interventions for cancer. Even within that small number, patients living in inner-city and rural areas are underrepresented in clinical trials. This study explores cancer patients' awareness and perceptions of cancer clinical trials, as well as their perceptions of patient-provider interactions related to discussing cancer clinical trials in order to improve accrual in cancer clinical trials. Interviews with 66 former and current in inner-city and rural cancer patients revealed a lack of awareness and understanding about clinical trials, as well as misconceptions about what clinical trials entail. Findings also revealed that commercials and television shows play a prominent role in forming inner-city and rural patients' attitudes and/or misconceptions about clinical trials. However, rural patients were more likely to hold unfavorable views about clinical trials than inner-city patients. Patient-provider discussions emerged as being crucial for increasing awareness of clinical trials among patients and recruiting them to trials. Findings from this study will inform communication strategies to enhance recruitment to cancer clinical trials by increasing awareness and countering misconceptions about clinical trials.

The UPTAKE study: Implications for the future of COVID-19 vaccination trial recruitment in UK and beyond

“…Free text comments from the survey revolved around the idea of the BAME community being used as 'guinea pigs' for trials to verify vaccine results, and mistrust around government strategies. Similar sentiments have been found in US studies [17], [20], [21]. This was likely to have taken in uence from social media views at the time of survey completion, particularly those highlighting adverse events from vaccine trials and vaccines trials being rushed.…”

Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative

“…One international effort, supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and others, developed a handbook for clinical trial communications, an example containing tools that complement the CTTI recommendations [33]. A recent study on the effectiveness of communications among inner city and rural populations for cancer trials found that television advertising was influential [34]. These activities are encouraging, and our recruitment recommendations support the need to extend recruitment communications across more domains.…”

Priorities for Rural Lymphoma Survivors: A Qualitative Study

“…Rural patients are less likely to seek information about research participation than are urban patients 31 and are more likely to possess negative views about medical research. 39 Community-based interventions to increase awareness about research opportunities and the value of clinical trial could provide a valuable pathway to alleviating rural disparities in cancer care and outcomes. [40][41][42] Rural Lymphoma Patient Priorities…”