2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for environmental effects on galaxy kinematics in groups and clusters atz∼ 1 from the ORELSE survey

Abstract: We present an investigation of the dependence of galaxy kinematics on the environment for a sample of 94 star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 0.9 from the ORELSE survey. ORELSE is a large photometric and spectroscopic campaign dedicated to mapping out and characterizing galaxy properties across a full range of environments in 15 fields containing large-scale structures (LSSs) in a redshift range of 0.6 < z < 1.3. We constrained the rotation velocity for our kinematic sample in an ORELSE field, containing the SC1604 su… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(224 reference statements)
12
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the correlation of M BH with bulge mass M bulge following equation 10 in Kormendy & Ho (2013) to estimate M BH and assume a bulge-to-total stellar mass ratio of 0.3 for galaxies log(M * )< 11 and 0.4 for log(M * )≥ 11 found in Lang et al (2014), which were derived from a star forming galaxy population selected in UVJ colour-colour diagram at 0.5 < z < 2.5. We confirm this ratio on average (mean) equal to 0.3 with a standard deviation of 0.3 using 142 galaxies in the ORELSE survey that occupy the star-forming region of the NUVrJ colour-colour diagram and have stellar mass in a range of 8.3<log(M * )<11 and median at 9.7 (Pelliccia et al 2019) 2 . We estimated the median L Edd for each bin in the low-and high-f AGN sub-samples binning by log(sSFR) as shown in the left panel of Figure 5.…”
Section: Estimating the States Of The Agnsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…We adopt the correlation of M BH with bulge mass M bulge following equation 10 in Kormendy & Ho (2013) to estimate M BH and assume a bulge-to-total stellar mass ratio of 0.3 for galaxies log(M * )< 11 and 0.4 for log(M * )≥ 11 found in Lang et al (2014), which were derived from a star forming galaxy population selected in UVJ colour-colour diagram at 0.5 < z < 2.5. We confirm this ratio on average (mean) equal to 0.3 with a standard deviation of 0.3 using 142 galaxies in the ORELSE survey that occupy the star-forming region of the NUVrJ colour-colour diagram and have stellar mass in a range of 8.3<log(M * )<11 and median at 9.7 (Pelliccia et al 2019) 2 . We estimated the median L Edd for each bin in the low-and high-f AGN sub-samples binning by log(sSFR) as shown in the left panel of Figure 5.…”
Section: Estimating the States Of The Agnsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Our aim is to study the impact of environment on the TFR by comparing this relation obtained for the MAGIC group sample to the one derived for other samples of either field (KMOS3D, Übler et al 2017;KROSS, Tiley et al 2019) or cluster (ORELSE, Pelliccia et al 2019) galaxies over a similar redshift range. The whole KMOS3D sample covers a wider redshift range.…”
Section: Stellar and Baryonic Mass Tully-fisher Relationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some studies have, however, targeted a few dozen galaxies in groups and (proto-)clusters at intermediate redshift with KMOS and FORS2 (e.g., Sobral et al 2013;Pérez-Martínez et al 2017;Böhm et al 2020). So far, the most complete study of the TFR as a function of environment has been performed from long-slit spectroscopy observations by Pelliccia et al (2019), using a sample of 94 galaxies at z ∼ 1, a fraction of which were members of clusters. They do not report significant modification of the TFR with environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If for a given galaxy, no cluster/group within ±6000 km s −1 are found, the parent structure is the one with the smallest η. See Shen et al (2019) and Pelliccia et al (2019) for more details on this calculation. Here, we discuss all possible uncertainties on the global environment measurement.…”
Section: Appendix a The Uncertainty Of Global Environment Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%