2021
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1869096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for potential drugs against SARS-CoV-2 through virtual screening on several molecular targets

Abstract: The acute respiratory syndrome caused by the SARS-CoV-2, known as COVID-19, has been ruthlessly tormenting the world population for more than six months. However, so far no effective drug or vaccine against this plague have emerged yet, despite the huge effort in course by researchers and pharmaceutical companies worldwide. Willing to contribute with this fight to defeat COVID-19, we performed a virtual screening study on a library containing Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs, in a search for m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remdesivir is a phosphoramide which, although reported as targeting RNA polymerase (RdRp) [42], is predicted by our model to have moderate M pro inhibitory activity (IC 50 = 34.4uM). This seems to be consistent with previous docking [9] and Molecular Dynamics studies [43] indicating that Remdesivir is a multi-target drug and does in some degree interact with M pro . Finally, for Omipalisib high activity is predicted (IC 50 = 11uM) by the model, which is in agreement with previous works reporting that this molecule targets M pro exhibiting strong inhibition of viral replication [16].…”
Section: Modelssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Remdesivir is a phosphoramide which, although reported as targeting RNA polymerase (RdRp) [42], is predicted by our model to have moderate M pro inhibitory activity (IC 50 = 34.4uM). This seems to be consistent with previous docking [9] and Molecular Dynamics studies [43] indicating that Remdesivir is a multi-target drug and does in some degree interact with M pro . Finally, for Omipalisib high activity is predicted (IC 50 = 11uM) by the model, which is in agreement with previous works reporting that this molecule targets M pro exhibiting strong inhibition of viral replication [16].…”
Section: Modelssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As in previous studies [ 22 , 23 ], the search space for molecular docking was defined to include all residues of the RBD of SC2Spike that interact with Hss ACE-2: Lys417, Gly446, Tyr449, Tyr453, Leu455, Phe456, Ala475, Phe486, Asn487, Tyr489, Gln493, Gly496, Gln498, Thr500, Asn501, Gly502, and Tyr505 [ 3 , 7 ]. The search space was a sphere with a radius of 23 Å and its center located at coordinates x = 215, y = 211, and z = 217.25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search space was a sphere with a radius of 23 Å and its center located at coordinates x = 215, y = 211, and z = 217.25. Each of the 10 ligands shown in Table S1 was docked into this search space using the same docking protocol as before [ 22 ], with 6 molecular docking runs conducted and the best 30 poses per run returned, resulting in 180 poses per ligand to be analyzed. The best-ranked poses, based on their MolDock scores (which estimate protein–ligand interaction energy) and the establishment of intermolecular interactions with residues of the RBD, were selected for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information about the 3D structures of these proteins retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) [25] for this study are summarized in Table 1. The software used was Molegro Virtual Docker® (MVD), and the protocol was the same validated before [26,27]. The 3D structures of the ligands were constructed in the Spartan 08 software [28], using the semi-empirical Parametric Method 3 (PM3) [29] for geometry optimization and the Natural Population Analysis (NPA) [30] method for atomic charges calculations.…”
Section: Docking Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported before [26,27], we estimated the binding free energies of each ligand in the respective protein binding pocket after the MD simulations through the MM-PBSA approach [41], which consider the vacuum potential energy, including bonded and non-bonded interactions and free energy of solvation. The g_mmpbsa tool [41] suited for the GROMACS package [40] was used for this task.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%