2017
DOI: 10.1177/0025802417725642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for prohibited items in mental-health hospitals: A randomised controlled trial of two metal-detecting technologies

Abstract: Weapons and other items with potential to cause harm are usually prohibited in mental-health hospitals and other psychiatric facilities. Detecting such prohibited items (PIs) can be problematic, particularly if concealed, and metal detectors are commonly used to search for such items. Our study compared two types of metal detection: continuous wave detection (CWD) by hand-held metal detector (HHMD) and magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) by a static pole device. In the study, real and dummy PIs were hidden on tes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, among six papers related to devices categorized as other technologies, two (33.5%) provided prevalence information (Cowman & Bowers, 2009; Marhoon et al, 2019), while the other four (66.5%) underlined safety advantages (Barrera et al, 2020; Cheng et al, 2013; Mills et al, 2020; Tully et al, 2015). Finally, between two studies that involved metal detectors, one provided only information about their availability (Gale et al, 2002), and the other showed positive results on safety (Laidlaw et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, among six papers related to devices categorized as other technologies, two (33.5%) provided prevalence information (Cowman & Bowers, 2009; Marhoon et al, 2019), while the other four (66.5%) underlined safety advantages (Barrera et al, 2020; Cheng et al, 2013; Mills et al, 2020; Tully et al, 2015). Finally, between two studies that involved metal detectors, one provided only information about their availability (Gale et al, 2002), and the other showed positive results on safety (Laidlaw et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Laidlaw et al (2017) performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of fixed and portable metal detectors (MDs) in identifying hidden items during patient search procedures. The researchers demonstrated the greatest ability of the fixed versus the portable MD to locate hidden items on two subjects and a simulated body cavity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.10. Magnetic anomaly detection scanners have proved effective in detecting a range of restrictive items ) 13 and do not require any contact between the person being searched and the operator. Searches can be undertaken at a distance which where possible may reduce the risk of infection.…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%