2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12551-017-0288-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for the Pareto frontier in multi-objective protein design

Abstract: The goal of protein engineering and design is to identify sequences that adopt three-dimensional structures of desired function. Often, this is treated as a single-objective optimization problem, identifying the sequence-structure solution with the lowest computed free energy of folding. However, many design problems are multi-state, multi-specificity, or otherwise require concurrent optimization of multiple objectives. There may be tradeoffs among objectives, where improving one feature requires compromising … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiobjective optimization algorithms have been applied to simultaneously promote the formation of the specific target association and disfavor the competing states, leading to the design of an abc heterotrimer capable of specific assembly (37) and an obligate abc heterotrimer where folding requires all three chains (18). However, the lack of high-resolution structural information critically limits our ability to control stability and specificity, particularly under conditions of increasing the complexity (38)(39)(40).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiobjective optimization algorithms have been applied to simultaneously promote the formation of the specific target association and disfavor the competing states, leading to the design of an abc heterotrimer capable of specific assembly (37) and an obligate abc heterotrimer where folding requires all three chains (18). However, the lack of high-resolution structural information critically limits our ability to control stability and specificity, particularly under conditions of increasing the complexity (38)(39)(40).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and Additional file 1 : Figure S5. This can be drawn in parallel to “Pareto-distribution” that is eminent in across fields of natural sciences and economics [ 23 , 24 ]. The variance in protein space in “Prevalent” and “Non-prevalent” groups are majorly influenced by the nature of “structure class”.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistent observation of 80/20 rule in topology space is perceptible as shown by Figure 1 and Figure S5. This can be drawn in parallel to "Paretodistribution" that is eminent in across fields of natural sciences and economics [21,22]. The variance in protein space in "Prevalent" and "Non-prevalent" groups are majorly influence by the nature of "structure class".…”
Section: Distribution Of Proteins In Topology Spacementioning
confidence: 98%