Searching for the sources of productivity from macro to micro and back

Abstract

Research into the sources of productivity growth has taken many disparate routes, from theoretical modeling using an aggregate perspective, to empirical explorations using firm-level data. This paper shows that models relying on the construct of the representative firm do not provide much scope to consider the effects of policy on productivity. The paper provides examples from the literature of the evidence against the representative firm assumption. Once the model is extended to include entry, exit, and heterogeneous firms, policy is able to affect aggregate productivity through many paths, including the efficiency of resource allocation and the margin of selection. As an example, some empirical explorations are provided for the effects of idiosyncratic distortions to firm profitability, the effects of exit costs, and the types of policy that may boost intangible investments.1 I am very indebted to my co-authors from the research projects cited in this paper: Pieter Gautier, John Halitwanger, Enrico Perotti, Stefano Scarpetta, and Joris de Wind, and all participants of the ONS/Eurostat ICT Impacts project.

What are the drivers of total factor productivity in the European Union?

“…2. Bartelsman (2010) offers an overview of the productivity growth analysis at different levels of aggregation. 3.…”

IT Adoption and Sustainable Growth of Firms in Different Industries—Are the Benefits Still Expected?

“…Neirotti and Paolucci [12] noted that the impact of IT adoption was largely dependent on industrial characteristics (such as complexity of products and production processes), and Neirotti and Paolucci [41] observed a sizeable positive effect from IT adoption when the firm belonged to an industry where the IT adoption rate was relatively low. However, although multiple arguments support the existence of differences in effects by industry, there is still a limited amount of empirical firm-level evidence on industry-specific effects of IT adoption [42,43], and some existing literatures are crudely comparing manufacturing and service sectors [23,33]. This study examined whether the impact of IT adoption is different among the five industrial sectors classified.…”

Replicator dynamics in value chains: explaining some puzzles of market selection

“…The latter has been boosted by the recent availability of firm and establishment level data, which start to shed some light on the determinants of firm's heterogeneity and characteristics (e.g. productivity and profitability) dispersion (Bartelsman, 2010). As a first approximation, we can distinguish between studies grounded on Empirical Industrial Organization (EIO) on the one hand and Neo-Schumpeterian theories on the other hand; however, the papers classified in this rough taxonomy often share a consistent part of methodological premises.…”