2019
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching with Consistent Prioritization for Multi-Agent Path Finding

Abstract: We study prioritized planning for Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF). Existing prioritized MAPF algorithms depend on rule-of-thumb heuristics and random assignment to determine a fixed total priority ordering of all agents a priori. We instead explore the space of all possible partial priority orderings as part of a novel systematic and conflict-driven combinatorial search framework. In a variety of empirical comparisons, we demonstrate state-of-the-art solution qualities and success rates, often with similar run… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAPF is an NP-hard problem even when approximating optimal solutions [14], [15]. MAPF planners can be broadly classified into three categories: coupled, decoupled, and dynamically-coupled approaches.…”
Section: A Multi-agent Path Finding (Mapf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAPF is an NP-hard problem even when approximating optimal solutions [14], [15]. MAPF planners can be broadly classified into three categories: coupled, decoupled, and dynamically-coupled approaches.…”
Section: A Multi-agent Path Finding (Mapf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prioritised solvers plan paths for each agent individually and avoid collisions with higher priority agents. The priority order can be determined before planning as in Cooperative A* (CA) [8], or determined on the fly as in Priority Based Search (PBS) [24]. Rule-base solvers like Parallel Push and Swap [25] guarantee to find solutions to MAPF in polynomial time, but the quality of these solutions is far from optimal.…”
Section: Multi-agent Path Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the overall priority order for path planning is decided by the task assignment sequence. It is worth noting that the path planning part of Algorithm 1 might be incomplete as the prioritised planning is known to be incomplete [24].…”
Section: Algorithm 1 Simultaneous Task Assignment and Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been done previously through a centralized controller; see Turpin et al (2013a), Chalaki and Malikopoulos (2019). In general, finding an optimal ordering is generally NP-Hard and an optimal ordering is not always guaranteed to exist; see Ma et al (2019). To reduce the complexity of ordering agents, much work has been done to decentralize the ordering problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%