1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0271-5309(98)00015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searle on language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper looks at John Searle's philosophical position, termed biological naturalism, as discussed in his two books Mind, Language, and Society (Searle 1998) and Language and Consciousness (Searle 2002): it does so from the vantage point of integrationism, as outlined by its founder Roy Harris (e.g., Harris 1996Harris , 1998Harris , 2009b. In some way, this paper continues the integrational critique of Searle's philosophy (of language) undertaken by Nigel Love in his article Searle on Language (Love 1999), which was based on three works by Searle published prior to 1998. 1 The present article is intended as a response to Searle's claim that consciousness is a purely biological problem, as well as a critical reflection on how Searle instrumentalizes language in order to support his views of respectively external realism and the correspondence theory of truth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This paper looks at John Searle's philosophical position, termed biological naturalism, as discussed in his two books Mind, Language, and Society (Searle 1998) and Language and Consciousness (Searle 2002): it does so from the vantage point of integrationism, as outlined by its founder Roy Harris (e.g., Harris 1996Harris , 1998Harris , 2009b. In some way, this paper continues the integrational critique of Searle's philosophy (of language) undertaken by Nigel Love in his article Searle on Language (Love 1999), which was based on three works by Searle published prior to 1998. 1 The present article is intended as a response to Searle's claim that consciousness is a purely biological problem, as well as a critical reflection on how Searle instrumentalizes language in order to support his views of respectively external realism and the correspondence theory of truth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The construct is also criticized. For example, Love ( 1999 ) and Rajagopalan ( 2000 ) highlight contradictory states of affairs. The setting of this research however, is not language philosophical, but applicational: we want to use Searle’s taxonomy of Speech Acts to structure a set of highly influential texts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ela, deixo registrados os meus sinceros agradecimentos e estendo-os aos demais integrantes da comissão avaliadora composta pelos professores doutores Daniel do Nascimento e Silva (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina) e Claudiana Nogueira Alencar (Universidade Estadual do Ceará). 2 Os contornos contraditórios da evidente relação de sucessão de Austin por Searle são reconhecidos na obra de Rajagopalan (2000), a partir de Love (1999). O estudioso elabora explicações mais voltadas para a "sociologia do conhecimento" que para um percurso naturalizado dos estudos da Filosofia da Linguagem.…”
Section: Prometer: Uma Via Perigosaunclassified